Microsoft Corporation v. EEE Business Inc. et al
Filing
127
ORDER GRANTING 121 Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/23/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2009)
Case 3:07-cv-01839-JSW
Document 122
Filed 03/20/2009
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Peter J. Van Zandt SBN 152321 Brian S. Whittemore SBN 241631 BLEDSOE, CATHCART, DIESTEL, PEDERSEN & TREPPA, LLP 601 California Street, 16th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 981-5411 Facsimile: (415) 981-0352 Attorneys for Defendants LIFENG WANG a/k/a ALICE WANG THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, vs. EEE BUSINESS INC., a California corporation, dba EBUSINESS.COM and EBZ EBZ; MING NI SHANG; LIFENG WANG aka ALICE WANG; NAMCY LINKER; and JOHN DOES 1-5 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 07-CV-01839-JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY Before the Honorable Jeffrey S. White
The Court has reviewed the Substitution of Attorneys pleading submitted on behalf of and with the consent of Defendant LIFENG WANG a/k/a ALICE WANG. Defendant ALICE WANG, currently pro se, is aware of and has consented to the proposed substitution. After considering the papers filed in support of this substitution and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: It is ORDERED that Peter Van Zandt, Esq. and Brian S. Whittemore, Esq., of the law firm Bledsoe, Cathcart, Deistel, Pedersen & Treppa, LLP, are substituted as counsel of record for defendant LIFENG WANG a/k/a ALICE WANG.
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
1
Case 3:07-cv-01839-JSW
Document 122
Filed 03/20/2009
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated: March 20, 2009 March 23, 2009
By____________________________ Honorable Jeffrey S. White
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?