Mazur v. Pacific Telesis Group Comprehensive Disability Benefits Plan et al

Filing 107

ORDER GRANTING 103 MOTION to Seal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/29/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-01904-JSW Document 105 Filed 01/27/2009 Page 1 of 4 1 Michele Ballard Miller (SBN 104198) mbm@millerlawgroup.com 2 Katherine L. Kettler (SBN 231586) klk@millerlawgroup.com 3 MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 4 111 Sutter Street, Ste. 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Tel. (415) 464-4300 6 Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP COMPREHENSIVE DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN, AT&T 7 UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PAUL MAZUR, Plaintiff, Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW [PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Complaint Filed: April 4, 2007 MILLER LAW GROUP 14 15 v. 16 PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP 17 COMPREHENSIVE DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN, AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN 18 NO. 1, and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW Defendants. Case 3:07-cv-01904-JSW Document 105 Filed 01/27/2009 Page 2 of 4 1 Based upon Plaintiff's Administrative Motion Pursuant to Rule 79-5, 2 Defendants' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support thereof, and the Declarations 3 of Nancy Watts on behalf of Defendants, and of Angela Papaioannou of behalf of Sedgwick 4 Claims Management Services ("Sedgwick"), a non-party to this action, and for compelling 5 reasons shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Administrative Motion Pursuant to Rule 6 79-5 is GRANTED as set forth below. 7 8 The documents attached to the Declaration of Michael S. Henderson in 9 Support of Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to 10 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (the "Henderson Decl.") and the text of Plaintiff's 11 Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants' Motion for 12 Summary Judgment ("Plaintiff's Cross-Motion") which refer to confidential information 13 contained in those documents are ordered sealed as follows: A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA MILLER LAW GROUP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW DOCUMENT Portions of Exhibit A to the Henderson Decl., (spreadsheet titled "2005 ­ 2008 STD Back/Spine Claims ­ PTG CDBP") Portions of Exhibit B to the Henderson Decl., Bates No. AT&T01290 ORDER As reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, Defendants' request that the claim file numbers set forth in this document be redacted and sealed is X Granted ____ Denied ____ As reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, Defendants' request that the percentages set forth on this page be redacted and sealed is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Plaintiff's Cross- Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and Motion, page 12:7-8 sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion previously lodged by Plaintiff with the Court is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Case 3:07-cv-01904-JSW Document 105 Filed 01/27/2009 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DOCUMENT Portions of Exhibit C to the Henderson Decl., Bates Nos. ATT/Mazur 002544002565 ORDER As reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, Defendants' request that the dollar amounts set forth on these pages be redacted and sealed is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Plaintiff's Cross- Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and Motion, page 11:21, sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion previously lodged by Plaintiff with the Court 12:2, 14:22-24 is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Portions of Exhibit C to the Henderson Decl., Bates Nos. ATT/Mazur 003528003536 Portions of Exhibit C to the Henderson Decl., Bates No. ATT/Mazur 003602 As reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, Defendants' request that the commercially sensitive information set forth on these pages be redacted and sealed is Granted ____ Denied ____ X As reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, Defendants' request that the commercially sensitive information set forth on this page be redacted and sealed is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Portions of Exhibit C to the Henderson Decl., Bates Nos. ATT/Mazur 003641 [may read as 3841] and 003696 As reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, Defendants' request that the commercially sensitive information set forth on these pages be redacted and sealed is Granted ____ Denied ____ X MILLER LAW GROUP 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff's Cross- Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and Motion, page 14:19- sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion previously lodged by Plaintiff with the Court 21 is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Portions of Exhibit C to the Henderson Decl., Bates No. ATT/Mazur 003838 As reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, Defendants' request that the substantive information from this non-party employee performance review set forth on this page be redacted and sealed is X Granted ____ Denied ____ 3 [PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW Case 3:07-cv-01904-JSW Document 105 Filed 01/27/2009 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DOCUMENT ORDER Portions of Exhibit D Defendants' request that the excerpts of this document included in to the Henderson the Exhibit be sealed in its entirety is Decl., Bates Nos. ATT/Mazur 005421, Granted ____ Denied ____ X 005435, 005437, 005438, 005441, and 005444 Plaintiff's Cross- Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and Motion, page 10:26- sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion previously lodged by Plaintiff with the Court 11:1 is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Portions of Exhibit D Defendants' request that the excerpts of this document included in to the Henderson the Exhibit be sealed in its entirety is Decl., Bates Nos. X ATT/Mazur 005566- Granted ____ Denied ____ 005589 Plaintiff's Cross- Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and Motion, page 15:1-6 sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted versions of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion previously lodged by Plaintiff with the Court is X Granted ____ Denied ____ MILLER LAW GROUP 14 15 16 17 Furthermore, Defendants' request that the three confidential portions quoted 18 from the page of Exhibit C to the Henderson Decl. Bates No. ATT/Mazur 003529 that 19 Plaintiff failed to redact in his filed Cross-Motion at page 14, lines 17-18, are ordered sealed 20 and redacted is 21 X Granted ____ Denied ____ 22 Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED by no later than February 2, 2009, to publicly file redacted versions of his Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants'Motion for Summary 23 Judgment and Exhibits A through C to the Declaration of Michael S. Henderson in accordance with this 24 Order. 25 26 27 28 4 [PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW January 28, 2009 Date: __________________ HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?