Mazur v. Pacific Telesis Group Comprehensive Disability Benefits Plan et al

Filing 119

ORDER GRANTING 116 MOTION to Seal. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/26/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2009)

1 Michele Ballard Miller (SBN 104198) [e-mail] 2 Katherine L. Kettler (SBN 231586) [e-mail] 3 MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 4 111 Sutter Street, Ste. 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Tel. [phone] Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP COMPREHENSIVE DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN, AT&T 7 UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1 8 9 10 11 12 13
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL MAZUR, Plaintiff,

Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW [PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Complaint Filed: April 4, 2007

MILLER LAW GROUP

14 15 v. 16

PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP 17 COMPREHENSIVE DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN, AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN 18 NO. 1, and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1
[PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW

Defendants.

1

Based upon Defendant's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Pursuant to

2 Civil Local Rule 79-5(c), the Declarations of Nancy Watts on behalf of Defendants, and of 3 Angela Papaioannou of behalf of Sedgwick Claims Management Services ("Sedgwick"), a 4 non-party to this action, and for compelling reasons shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 5 the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal is GRANTED as set forth below. 6 7 The Declaration of Angela Papaioannou dated February 13, 2009 attached as

8 Exhibit C to the Declaration of Katherine L. Kettler in Support of Defendants' Opposition to 9 Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Reply (the "Feb. 10 13 Papaioannou Decl."), the Declaration of Angela Papaioannou in Support of Defendants' 11 Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' 12 Reply (the "Papaioannou Opp. Decl."), and the Supplemental Declaration of Nancy Watts in 13 Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

MILLER LAW GROUP

14 Defendants' Reply (the "Supp. Watts Decl."), including Exhibit A attached to the Supp. Watts 15 Decl., as well as the narrowly designated portions of the text of Defendant's Memorandum of 16 Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary 17 Judgment and Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 18 ("Defendants' Opposition and Reply"), which refer to confidential information contained in the 19 above-listed declarations and exhibits, ARE ORDERED SEALED as follows: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2
[PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW

DOCUMENT Specific Portions of the Feb. 13 Papaioannou Decl., Page 2, Lines 2527, and Page 3, Lines 1-28 (Exh. C to the Declaration of Katherine L. Kettler)

ORDER Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court in connection to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Reply, is X Granted ____ Denied ____

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

DOCUMENT Defendants' Opposition and Reply, Portions of Page 7, n.9 Between Lines 2023. Specific Portions of the Papaioannou Opposition Decl., Page 2, Lines 2327, Page 3, Lines 127, and Page 4, Lines 1-2 and 6-8 Defendants' Opposition and Reply, Portions of Page 18, Lines 1015 and n.27 Between Lines 2327. Specific Portions of the Supp. Watts Decl., Page 2, Lines 9-19

ORDER Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, is Granted ____ Denied ____ X Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court in connection to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Reply, is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court in connection to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants Reply, is X Granted ____ Denied ____

MILLER LAW GROUP

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendants' Opposition and Reply, Portions of page 20, n. 30 Between Lines 2228 Specific Portions of the Supp. Watts Decl., Page 2, Lines 21-22

Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court in connection to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Reply, is X Granted ____ Denied ____

Defendants' Opposition and Reply, Portions of Page 21, n. 31 Between Lines 22 and 25

Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court, is X Granted ____ Denied ____

3
[PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

DOCUMENT Specific Portions of the Supp. Watts Decl., Page 2, Lines 24-25, and Page 3, Lines 2-9

ORDER Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants with the Court in connection to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Reply, is X Granted ____ Denied ____

Exhibit A to the Defendants' request that this document lodged by Defendants' with the Court in connection to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Supp. Watts Decl. Amended Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Reply be sealed in its entirety is X Granted ____ Denied ____ Defendants' Opposition and Reply, Portions of Page 18, Between Lines 5-9 Defendants' request that portions of these lines be redacted and sealed as reflected in the redacted and highlighted version of this document lodged by Defendants' with the Court, is X Granted ____ Denied ____

MILLER LAW GROUP

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Furthermore, Defendants' request that the Court order the sealing of portions of Defendants' Opposition and Reply at page 16, lines 13-16; n.24 on page 16, lines 2225; and n. 25 on page 16, lines 25-28, which Defendants seek to seal and keep from the public record in compliance with this Court's prior Sealing Order (Docket No. 107) entered in this action on January 29, 2009, for the compelling reasons upon which that prior Sealing Order was granted, is X Granted _____ Denied _____

February 26, 2009 Date: __________________ HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

4
[PROPOSED] SEALING ORDER Case No.: C 07-1904 JSW