Mazur v. Pacific Telesis Group Comprehensive Disability Benefits Plan et al
Filing
132
ORDER TO DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DOCUMENTS SHOULD NOT BE FILED IN THE PUBLIC RECORD. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/19/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 PAUL MAZUR, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP COMPREHENSIVE DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN, et al., Defendants. / ORDER TO DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DOCUMENTS SHOULD NOT BE FILED IN THE PUBLIC RECORD No. C 07-01904 JSW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On March 6, 2009, Plaintiff filed a request for a sealing order pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), in which he seeks to file under seal portions of his reply in support of his amended cross-motion for summary judgment which references information designated confidential by Defendants. Pursuant to Rule 79-5(d), when such a request is made, within five (5) days thereafter, "the designating party must file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the designated information is sealable." If the designating fails to file such a declaration, "the document or proposed filing will be made part of the public record." Defendants' declaration was due to be filed by March 13, 2009, but has not yet been filed. Accordingly, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to file a declaration establishing cause for sealing any portion of Plaintiff's reply brief by no later than March 23, 2009. If Defendants fail to comply with this Order, the Court shall deny Plaintiff's motion and shall order that the entire reply brief be filed in the public record. The Court notes that this is the last
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
time it will remind any party to this case of their obligations under Local Rule 79-5(d). Failure to file the requisite declaration within the required time period will automatically result in the Court denying a motion to seal and ordering the exhibits filed in the public record. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 19, 2009
JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
