Cruz et al v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Filing
325
STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Plaintiffs' FLSA Allegations Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 9/27/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
1
6
MAUREEN E. MCCLAIN, Bar No. 62050
KRISTA STEVENSON JOHNSON, Bar No. 185241
MATTHEW P. VANDALL, Bar No. 196962
LITTLER MENDELSON, PC
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
Email:
mmcclain@littler.com
kjohnson@littler.com
mvandall@littler.com
7
Attorneys for Defendant
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
8
Scott Edward Cole, Esq. (S.B. #160744)
Molly A. DeSario, Esq. (S.B. #230763)
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 891-9800
Facsimile: (510) 891-7030
Email: scole@scalaw.com
Email: mdesario@scalaw.com
Web: www.scalaw.com
2
3
4
5
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
Case No. C-07-2050 SC
MIGUEL A. CRUZ and JOHN D.
HANSEN, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
CONSOLIDATED ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ FLSA
ALLEGATIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.,
Defendant.
___________________________________
ROBERT RUNNINGS, individually, and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Case No.: C-07-4012 SC
CONSOLIDATED ACTION
Plaintiff,
v.
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.,
Defendant
Date:
TBD
Time:
TBD
Dept.: Courtroom 1, 17th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Samuel Conti
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N
A PROF ESSION AL C ORP OR A TION
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
1.
Case Nos. C 07 2050 SC and C 07 04012 SC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS Plaintiffs John Hansen and Miguel Cruz included a claim arising under the Fair
Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”) in their initial complaint.
WHEREAS Plaintiff Robert Runnings did not include an FLSA claim in his initial
complaint;
WHEREAS Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (“Defendant”) denies that it violated the
FLSA with respect to Plaintiffs Miguel A. Cruz, John D. Hansen and/or Robert Runnings
(“Plaintiffs”);
WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ California state law claims subsume, as a practical matter, relief
available via the FLSA claims alleged in the operative complaints;
WHEREAS no party will incur any prejudice as a result of this Stipulation; and
10
WHEREAS Plaintiffs Cruz and Hansen do not wish to pursue their FLSA claims through the
11
12
13
14
instant litigation;
THE PARTIES, THEREFORE, AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Plaintiffs request, and Defendant does not oppose, dismissal of Plaintiffs’ FLSA claims
without prejudice.
15
16
Dated: September 26, 2011
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
17
By:
18
/s/ Molly A. DeSario
Molly A. DeSario, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
19
20
I HEREBY ATTEST THAT THE CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT IS ACCEPTABLE TO
ALL PERSONS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT
21
22
Dated: September 26, 2011
LITTLER MENDELSON, APC
23
24
By:
25
/s/Matthew P. Vandall
Matthew P. Vandall
Attorneys for Defendant
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N
A PROF ESSION AL C ORP OR A TION
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
2.
Case Nos. C 07 2050 SC and C 07 04012 SC
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiffs’ FLSA allegations are hereby dismissed without prejudice.
3
By:
UNIT
ED
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
The Honorable Samuel Conti
United States District Conti
Judge
l
NO
amue
Judge S
H
ER
LI
RT
8
9
FO
7
A
6
September 27
Dated: _______________, 2011
RT
U
O
5
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N
A PROF ESSION AL C ORP OR A TION
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
3.
Case Nos. C 07 2050 SC and C 07 04012 SC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?