Cruz et al v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Filing 76

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 1;re 74 Order Set Hearings. Signed by Hon. Joseph C. Spero on 10/10/2008. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MIGUEL A. CRUZ v. Plaintiff(s), No. 07-02050 (JCS) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DOLLAR TREE STORES INC. Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ ROBERT RUNNINGS, et al. Plaintiff(s), ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND D E N Y I N G MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 1 No. 07-4012 SC (JCS) United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. Defendant(s). / A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses To Plaintiff's Special Interrogatory No. 1 was held on October 10, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California. All parties appeared through counsel. For the reasons stated on the record, and good cause appearing, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follow 1. Defendant shall provide to plaintiffs the contact information requested, other than home phone telephone numbers, for 100 of the punitive class members in this case. The information shall be Confidential under the protective order in this case Order Granting Pl Mot Compel.wpd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. Within 10 days the parties shall meet and confer and agree on the procedure for selecting the 100 putative class members, and the date on which the contact information shall be provided. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2008 JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Pl Mot Compel.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?