Smith v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation

Filing 150

STIPULATION AND ORDER re: Filing Date for Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/30/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LAW OFFICES OF KIM E. CARD KIM E. CARD (CA Bar No: 147779) 1690 Sacramento Street Berkeley, California 94702 Telephone: (510) 684-5863 Facsimile: (510) 644-2659 kimecard@sonic.net CHAVEZ & GERTLER, LLP JONATHAN E. GERTLER (CA Bar No: 111531) CHRISTIAN SCHREIBER (CA Bar No. 245597) 42 Miller Avenue Mill Valley, California 94941 Telephone: (415) 381-5599 Facsimile: (415) 381-5572 jon@chavezgertler.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs GERALD SMITH, et al., and the Certified Plaintiff Class 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 GERALD SMITH, et al, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. CARDINAL LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a North Carolina Corporation, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C07-02104 SC CLASS ACTION STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT [PROPOSED] ORDER 27 28 STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL 1 2 3 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, the parties to the above-entitled action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, agree and request as follows: 1. On April 11, 2011, this Court entered its Order (1) Granting Preliminary Approval 4 to Proposed Class Action Settlement, (2) Appointing Settlement Administrator; (3) Approving 5 and Directing Notice to the Class, and (4) Setting Date for Final Approval Hearing and Related 6 7 8 9 Dates (“Preliminary Approval Order”) (ECF Document #144). 2. As part of the Court’s Preliminary Approval Order, the Court scheduled the Final Approval Hearing for August 12, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. The Settlement Class members were notified of this date in the Notice, and the parties do not request any change with respect to the 10 date for the Final Approval Hearing. 11 12 13 14 15 3. Under the normal briefing schedule for motions set forth in Local Rule 7-2, and also as specified in the Preliminary Approval Order, the currently scheduled date for the filing of the Motion for Final Approval is July 8, 2011 (35 days prior to August 12, 2011). 4. The “Notice Mailing Date” for the mailing of Notice of the settlement to Class 16 Members was May 11, 2011 (30 days after the date the Preliminary Approval Order was 17 entered). Based on this Notice Mailing Date, the deadline for the submission of Claims, and for 18 any requests for exclusion or objections, is July 11, 2011 (60 days from the Notice Mailing Date 19 of May 11, 2011). Thus, the currently scheduled date for the filing of the Motion for Final 20 Approval (July 8, 2011) is prior to the deadline for the submission of Claims, requests for 21 exclusion and any objections (July 11, 2011). 22 5. By this Stipulation, the parties hereby agree to, and request the Court’s approval 23 for, a two-week continuance of the filing date for the Motion for Final Approval, from July 8, 24 2011 to July 22, 2011. This new date of July 22, 2011 would be 21 days prior to the Final 25 Approval Hearing on August 12, 2011. The Motion for Final Approval will be unopposed by 26 27 28 Defendant. If any objections are filed, they will have been filed by July 11, 2011. The reason to continue the filing date for the Final Approval Motion is so that the Settlement Administrator will have time to receive and to process all of the Claims and requests for exclusion, and so that 1 STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL 1 this information can then be relayed to the Court in the Final Approval Motion. The continuance 2 would also allow the parties to address any objections to the settlement. 3 6. Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ 4 Fees will be filed as scheduled on June 27, 2011 (14 days prior to the July 11 deadline for any 5 requests for exclusion or objections). The parties do not request any change with respect to the 6 7 8 9 filing date for the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. The Notice mailed to Settlement Class members, in the form approved by the Court, informed the class members that the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees would be filed on or before June 27, 2011, but did not make any representation as to the date that the Motion for Final Approval would be filed. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 Dated: June 24, 2011 13 LAW OFFICES OF KIM E. CARD By: ______________/s/____________ KIM E. CARD Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Certified Plaintiff Class 14 15 16 17 CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP Dated: June 23, 2011 18 19 SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT & HANSON By: __________/s/_______________________ Robert L. Browning Attorneys for Defendant CARDINAL LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 20 21 22 ________________________________ THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI ERED O ORD IT IS S UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE R NIA onti NO amuel C Judge S RT FO 28 6/30 Dated: ___________, 2011 RT U O 27 S DISTRICT TE C TA 2 ER STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FORC N F FINAL APPROVAL H LI 26 Approval Hearing remains on calendar for August 12, 2011 at 10:00. A 25 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement on or before July 22, 2011. The Final S 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs shall file their UNIT ED 23 D IS T IC T O R 1 ATTESTATION REGARDING THE SIGNATURE OF NON-FILING COUNSEL 2 I, Kim E. Card, co-counsel for the Plaintiffs in this action declare that, prior to the 3 electronic filing of this Stipulation, I attained express written confirmation from Defendant’s 4 counsel that he signed off on the Stipulation, authorized his electronic signature to be affixed 5 hereto, and consented to and concurred in the filing of this document. 6 7 8 Dated: June 24, 2011 _____________/s/________________________ KIM E. CARD 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?