Smith v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation
Filing
150
STIPULATION AND ORDER re: Filing Date for Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/30/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
LAW OFFICES OF KIM E. CARD
KIM E. CARD (CA Bar No: 147779)
1690 Sacramento Street
Berkeley, California 94702
Telephone: (510) 684-5863
Facsimile: (510) 644-2659
kimecard@sonic.net
CHAVEZ & GERTLER, LLP
JONATHAN E. GERTLER (CA Bar No: 111531)
CHRISTIAN SCHREIBER (CA Bar No. 245597)
42 Miller Avenue
Mill Valley, California 94941
Telephone: (415) 381-5599
Facsimile: (415) 381-5572
jon@chavezgertler.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs GERALD SMITH, et al.,
and the Certified Plaintiff Class
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
18
GERALD SMITH, et al, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
vs.
CARDINAL LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION, a North Carolina
Corporation,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C07-02104 SC
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR
MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF
CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
[PROPOSED] ORDER
27
28
STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL
1
2
3
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, the parties to the above-entitled action, through their
respective counsel, hereby stipulate, agree and request as follows:
1.
On April 11, 2011, this Court entered its Order (1) Granting Preliminary Approval
4
to Proposed Class Action Settlement, (2) Appointing Settlement Administrator; (3) Approving
5
and Directing Notice to the Class, and (4) Setting Date for Final Approval Hearing and Related
6
7
8
9
Dates (“Preliminary Approval Order”) (ECF Document #144).
2.
As part of the Court’s Preliminary Approval Order, the Court scheduled the Final
Approval Hearing for August 12, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. The Settlement Class members were
notified of this date in the Notice, and the parties do not request any change with respect to the
10
date for the Final Approval Hearing.
11
12
13
14
15
3.
Under the normal briefing schedule for motions set forth in Local Rule 7-2, and
also as specified in the Preliminary Approval Order, the currently scheduled date for the filing of
the Motion for Final Approval is July 8, 2011 (35 days prior to August 12, 2011).
4.
The “Notice Mailing Date” for the mailing of Notice of the settlement to Class
16
Members was May 11, 2011 (30 days after the date the Preliminary Approval Order was
17
entered). Based on this Notice Mailing Date, the deadline for the submission of Claims, and for
18
any requests for exclusion or objections, is July 11, 2011 (60 days from the Notice Mailing Date
19
of May 11, 2011). Thus, the currently scheduled date for the filing of the Motion for Final
20
Approval (July 8, 2011) is prior to the deadline for the submission of Claims, requests for
21
exclusion and any objections (July 11, 2011).
22
5.
By this Stipulation, the parties hereby agree to, and request the Court’s approval
23
for, a two-week continuance of the filing date for the Motion for Final Approval, from July 8,
24
2011 to July 22, 2011. This new date of July 22, 2011 would be 21 days prior to the Final
25
Approval Hearing on August 12, 2011. The Motion for Final Approval will be unopposed by
26
27
28
Defendant. If any objections are filed, they will have been filed by July 11, 2011. The reason to
continue the filing date for the Final Approval Motion is so that the Settlement Administrator
will have time to receive and to process all of the Claims and requests for exclusion, and so that
1
STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL
1
this information can then be relayed to the Court in the Final Approval Motion. The continuance
2
would also allow the parties to address any objections to the settlement.
3
6.
Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’
4
Fees will be filed as scheduled on June 27, 2011 (14 days prior to the July 11 deadline for any
5
requests for exclusion or objections). The parties do not request any change with respect to the
6
7
8
9
filing date for the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. The Notice mailed to Settlement Class members,
in the form approved by the Court, informed the class members that the Motion for Attorneys’
Fees would be filed on or before June 27, 2011, but did not make any representation as to the
date that the Motion for Final Approval would be filed.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12
Dated: June 24, 2011
13
LAW OFFICES OF KIM E. CARD
By:
______________/s/____________
KIM E. CARD
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the
Certified Plaintiff Class
14
15
16
17
CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP
Dated: June 23, 2011
18
19
SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT &
HANSON
By: __________/s/_______________________
Robert L. Browning
Attorneys for Defendant CARDINAL LOGISTICS
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
20
21
22
________________________________
THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
R NIA
onti
NO
amuel C
Judge S
RT
FO
28
6/30
Dated: ___________, 2011
RT
U
O
27
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
2
ER
STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FORC
N
F FINAL APPROVAL
H
LI
26
Approval Hearing remains on calendar for August 12, 2011 at 10:00.
A
25
Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement on or before July 22, 2011. The Final
S
24
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs shall file their
UNIT
ED
23
D IS T IC T O
R
1
ATTESTATION REGARDING THE SIGNATURE OF NON-FILING COUNSEL
2
I, Kim E. Card, co-counsel for the Plaintiffs in this action declare that, prior to the
3
electronic filing of this Stipulation, I attained express written confirmation from Defendant’s
4
counsel that he signed off on the Stipulation, authorized his electronic signature to be affixed
5
hereto, and consented to and concurred in the filing of this document.
6
7
8
Dated: June 24, 2011
_____________/s/________________________
KIM E. CARD
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION RE: FILING DATE FOR MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?