Mediostream Inc. v. Priddis Music Inc. et al
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting
17 Motion to Continue (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2007)
Mediostream Inc. v. Priddis Music Inc. et al
Doc. 19
Case 3:07-cv-02127-PJH
Document 19
Filed 09/13/2007
Page 1 of 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP 1457392.1
MARC E. MAYER (SBN 190969), mem@msk.com MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP 11377 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90064-1683 Telephone: (310) 312-2000 Facsimile: (310) 312-3100 Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. Word Music, LLC, Dayspring Music, LLC, Wordspring Music, LLC, Unichappell Music, Inc., Chappell & Co., Inc., Cotillion Music, Inc., Rightsong Music, Inc., Walden Music, Inc., Warner/Tamerlane Publishing Corp., and WB Music Corp.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MEDIOSTREAM, INC., Plaint iff, v. PRIDDIS MUSIC, INC. AND WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., Defendants. CASE NO. C 07 2127 PJH [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF THE SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
The Court has read and considered the Parties' Joint Motion, Joint Stipulation and Request for A Four-Week Cont inuance of the September 27, 2007, Case Management Conference.
Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' request. The September 27, 2007, Case Management Conference is re-set for October 25, 2007, at 2:30 p.m.
IST
DATED: 9/13/07
UNIT ED
RI ES D By: ____________________CT C ___ ___ AT T Judge, United States District Northern District of California RED
RT U O
S
28 29
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
CASE NO. C 07 2127 PJH
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Dockets.Justia.com
A
C
LI
FO
H hyllis J. Judge P
amilton
R NIA
IT IS S
O ORD
E
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?