Eap v. United States of America et al
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 124 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 3, 2009 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. / SUSAN WYCKOFF, Plaintiff, No. C 07-3600 SI; No. 07-2301 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiffs have filed administrative motions requesting that the Court vacate all presently calendared briefing and hearing dates for plaintiffs' spoliation motion and defendants' motion for summary judgment, and that the Court set a new schedule once Judge Zimmerman resolves ongoing discovery disputes between the parties. The Court finds it unnecessary to vacate all current dates, and DENIES plaintiffs' motion without prejudice to the Court revisiting the schedule following the February 18, 2009 hearing before Judge Zimmerman. (Docket No. 127 in 07-3600 and Docket No. 124 in 072301).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?