Wixon et al v. Wyndham Resort Development Corp., et al

Filing 439

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 12/17/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:07-cv-02361-JSW Document438 Filed12/17/09 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jonathan K. Levine (State Bar No. 220289) jkl@girardgibbs.com Elizabeth C. Pritzker (State Bar No. 146267) ecp@girardgibbs.com Todd I. Espinosa (State Bar No. 209591) tie@girardgibbs.com GIRARD GIBBS LLP 601 California Street San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 981-4800 Facsimile: (415) 981-4846 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs Clarke and Rebecca Wixon and Norman and Barbara Wixon [Additional counsel appear on signature page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Clarke and Rebecca Wixon and Norman and Barbara Wixon, derivatively and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Wyndham Resort Development Corp. (f/k/a Trendwest Resorts, Inc.), Gene Hensley, David Herrick, John Henley, Peggy Fry and John McConnell, and nominally, WorldMark, The Club, Defendants. Case No. C 07-02361 JSW (BZ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO WYNDHAM RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION'S INTERROGATORIES CLASS AND DERIVATIVE ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO WYNDHAM'S INTERROGATORIES CASE NO. C 07 2361 JSW (BZ) Case3:07-cv-02361-JSW Document438 Filed12/17/09 Page2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS the Court, on April 15, 2009, entered its order, inter alia, directing that Plaintiffs Clarke and Rebecca Wixon and Norman and Barbara Wixon (collectively, "Plaintiffs") provide further responses to Defendant Wyndham Resort Development Corporation's ("Wyndham") Interrogatories Nos. 7, 9, 10 and 11 ("Wyndham's Interrogatories") within 60 days after the Court's ruling on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification (Dkt. No. 241); WHEREAS the Court, on October 19, 2009, entered its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 420); WHEREAS, in accordance with the Court's April 15, 2009 order, Plaintiffs' further responses to Wyndham's Interrogatories are due on December 18, 2009; WHEREAS, the parties are discussing methods for resolving this litigation, with assistance from the Honorable William J. Cahill (Ret.) of JAMS; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have requested and Wyndham has agreed to a limited extension of the date by which Plaintiffs' further responses shall be provided; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Wyndham, by and through their respective counsel, that, subject to the approval of the Court, Plaintiffs shall respond fully in writing to Wyndham's Interrogatories, and serve said responses by email and U.S. mail by close of business Pacific Standard Time on January 14, 2010, rather than December 18, 2009. 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO WYNDHAM'S INTERROGATORIES CASE NO. C 07 2361 JSW (BZ) Case3:07-cv-02361-JSW Document438 Filed12/17/09 Page3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 17, 2009 Respectfully submitted, GIRARD GIBBS LLP By: /s/ Elizabeth C. Pritzker Elizabeth C. Pritzker Jonathan K. Levine Todd Espinosa GIRARD GIBBS, LLP 601 California Street, 14th Floor San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 981-4800 Facsimile: (415) 981-4846 James Helfrich (admitted pro hac vice) GERSH & HELFRICH, LLP 1860 Blake Street, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: (303) 293-2333 Facsimile: (303) 293-2433 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs Clarke and Rebecca Wixon and Norman and Barbara Wixon 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO WYNDHAM'S INTERROGATORIES CASE NO. C 07 2361 JSW (BZ) Case3:07-cv-02361-JSW Document438 Filed12/17/09 Page4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 17, 2009 TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP By:____/s/_William M. Droze _________ William M. Droze J. Kirk Quillian A. William Loeffler 5200 Bank of America Plaza 600 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30308-2216 Telephone: (404) 885-3000 Facsimile: (404) 885-3900 SCHIFF HARDIN LLP Stephen M. Hankins Jeffrey V. Commisso One Market, Spear Street Tower, 32nd Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 901-8700 Facsimile: (415) 901-8701 Attorneys for Defendant Wyndham Resort Development Corporation [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. December 17, DATED: ____________ 2009 ____________________________________ The Honorable Bernard Zimmerman UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO WYNDHAM'S INTERROGATORIES CASE NO. C 07 2361 JSW (BZ) Case3:07-cv-02361-JSW Document438 Filed12/17/09 Page5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Elizabeth C. Pritzker, hereby certify that on December 17, 2009, I filed the following document(s): 1. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO WYNDHAM RESORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION'S INTERROGATORIES By ECF (Electronic Case Filing): I e-filed the above-detailed document utilizing the United States District Court, Northern District of California's mandated ECF service on December 17, 2009. Counsel of record are required by the Court to be registered e-filers, and as such are automatically e-served with a copy of the document(s) upon confirmation of e-filing. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, CA on December 17, 2009. /S/ Elizabeth C. Pritzker 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO WYNDHAM'S INTERROGATORIES CASE NO. C 07 2361 JSW (BZ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?