Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Shapy International, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE AND SETTING HEARING. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on May 2, 2007. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2007)

Download PDF
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Shapy International, Inc. Doc. 12 Case 3:07-cv-02362-JSW Document 12 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, Plaintiff, v. SHAPY INTERNATIONAL, Defendant. / No. C 07-02362 JSW ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE AND SETTING HEARING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has received Plaintiff's ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order. Having reviewed Plaintiff's moving papers, and in light of the fact that Plaintiff has provided notice to the Defendant, Defendant is HEREBY ORDERED to file and serve a response to Plaintiff's application by no later than 1:00 p.m. on Thursday May 3, 2007, and to hand deliver a copy of the response to Chambers at that time. The parties are HEREBY ORDERED to appear for a hearing on Plaintiff's application at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, May 4, 2007. The parties shall be prepared to discuss an appropriate bond at the hearing, in the event Plaintiff's application is granted. Plaintiff is FURTHER ORDERED to serve a copy of this Order on Defendant by no later than 4:30 p.m. on May 2, 2007, and file proof of such service with the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 2, 2004 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-02362-JSW Document 12 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?