Doe v. Geller et al

Filing 16

ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. (tjs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2007)

Doe v. Geller et al

Doc. 16

Case 3:07-cv-02478-VRW

Document 16

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California Doe, Plaintiff(s), v. Geller, Defendant(s). 07-02478 VRW NOTICE RE: NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall Meet and Confer forthwith in an attempt to agree on an ADR process for this matter. Thereafter, counsel, on behalf of themselves and each party, promptly shall file an ADR Certification and either 1) a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process, or 2) a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (Civil L.R. 16-8(b), ADR L. R. 3-5(b) Civil L.R. 16-8(c), ADR L. R. 3-5(c), (d)). (These forms are available at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov.)

Further, in accordance with ADR L.R. 3-5(e) counsel shall concurrently provide a copy of all documents filed pursuant to this notice directly to the ADR Unit either by fax [phone]), hand delivery (ADR Program, USDC, Northern District of California, Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 07-02478 VRW -1Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-02478-VRW

Document 16

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California), or by PDF attachment to an e-mail directed to [e-mail].

It is the responsibility of counsel to schedule an ADR Phone Conference, if required, to occur before the Case Management Conference.

Dated: September 5, 2007 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 07-02478 VRW -2ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 [e-mail]

Case 3:07-cv-02478-VRW

Document 16

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 3 of 4

PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Case Number: Doe v. Geller 07-02478 VRW

I declare that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the action. My business address is: ADR Program United States District Court Norther District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue Floor 16 San Francisco, CA 94102 On September 5, 2007, I served a true and correct copy of: Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order [X] electronically, I caused said documents to be transmitted using ECF as specified by General Order No. 45 to the following parties: Jason M. Schultz Electronic Frontier Foundation 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 [e-mail] Marcia Clare Hofmann Electronic Frontier Foundation 1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 650 Washington, DC 20009 [e-mail] Corynne McSherry Electronic Frontier Foundation 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 [e-mail] Jeffrey Michael Vucinich Clapp Moroney Bellagamba & Vucinich

Case 3:07-cv-02478-VRW

Document 16

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 4 of 4

1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300 San Bruno, CA 94066 [e-mail] Richard Winelander 1005 North Calvert Street Baltimore, MD 21202 [e-mail]

[ ] by Facsimile, I caused said documents to be transmitted to the following parties by fax machine: [ ] by U. S. Mail, I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid in the United States Post Office Mail Box in San Francisco, California, addressed as follows:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on September 5, 2007 in San Francisco, Cali forni a . RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 [e-mail]