Doe v. Geller et al

Filing 27

Proposed Order re 24 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Uri Geller, Explorologist Ltd.. (Vucinich, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/2/2007)

Download PDF
Doe v. Geller et al Doc. 27 Case 3:07-cv-02478-VRW Document 27 Filed 10/02/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jeffrey M. Vucinich (SBN 67906) jvucinich@clappmoroney.com Clapp, Moroney, Bellagamba & Vucinich 1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300 San Bruno, CA 94066 Telephone: 650.989.5400 Facsimile: 650.989.5499 Richard Winelander (pro hac vice) rw@rightverdict.com 1005 North Calvert Street Baltimore Maryland 21202 Telephone: 410.576.7980 Facsimile: 443.378.7503 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN DOE A/K/A BRIAN SAPIENT, Plaintiff, vs. URI GELLER and EXPLOROLOGIST LTD., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:07-cv-02478 VRW [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATER JURISDICTION; LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION; IMPROPER VENUE AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE BASED Upon consideration of the of Defendants Motion to Dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue and failure to state a claim upon which relief and the answer of the Plaintiff, it is this ______ day of ______________, 200__, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. _________________________________________ Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS -1- Case Number 3:07-cv-02478 VRW Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?