Intelligraphics, Inc. v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.

Filing 152

STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER RE: MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. Hearing on the Motion for Sanctions is set for Jan. 23, 2009 at 9:30 AM. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/17/08. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SOMMERS & SCHWARTZ LLP Andrew Schwartz (SBN 100210) ahs@ sommersschwartz.com 550 California Street Sacramento Tower, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

MAYER BROWN LLP Michael A. Molano (SBN 171057) [e-mail] Branndon Baum (SBN 121318) [e-mail] Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto. California 94306-2112 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Marvel Semiconductor, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Intelligraphics, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. C-07-2499 JCS INTELLIGRAPHICS, INC Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, vs. MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. Defendant and Counterclaimant. WHEREAS the Court ordered in Docket No. 107 that the deposition of Nikolous Baer to be taken on November 7, 2008, after the then current close of expert discovery on November 1, 2008; WHEREAS the Court previously sua sponte set specific deadlines and dates for dispositive motions and trial, while the parties negotiated and agreed to the other dates in the case schedule; WHEREAS the proposed rescheduling of the hearing date of Marvell Semiconductor, Inc's ("Marvell's") Motion for Sanctions, and the times for filing and service of the Opposition and Reply thereto will not affect the schedule for trial that was set by this Court; and WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiff chiefly involved in the discovery matters at issue in the subject motion, Frank F. Sommers, is now completing a long scheduled teaching assignment in
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER RE: MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER RE: MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

-1-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Tomsk, the Russian Federation, and has requested the subject rescheduling of the hearing and Opposition dates to facilitate his ability to properly respond to the motion and also complete his teaching assignment; WHEREAS, in the interests of cooperating to defer the subject motion schedule without further intervention by the Court, the parties agree that the hearing date and time for filing and service of the Opposition to the subject motion and Reply can be deferred without affecting the schedule for trial that was set by this court; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby jointly request that the Court order the following case schedule (where the bolded rows represent changes to the current schedule);

EVENT Fact Discovery Commencement Close (except as noted) Discovery motions to be heard no later than Deposition of Ken Wu Intelligraphics' responses to Marvell's SecondSet of Interrogatories served no later than Marvell's responses to Intelligraphics' Second Set of Interrogatories served no later than Deposition of Scott Lawson 30(b)(6) Deposition of Intelligraphics (Lawson topics) 30(b)(6) Deposition of Intelligraphics (Schiefer topics) Expert Discovery

CURRENT DATE

PROPOSED DATE

August 17, 2007 August 27, 2008 September 8, 2008 September 11, 2008 September 22, 2008

September 22, 208

September 29, 2008 September 30, 2008

October 14, 2008

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER RE: MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

-2-

1 2 3

Opening expert reports served no later than

October 2, 2008

EVENT 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER RE: MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Rebuttal expert reports served no later than Depositions of all experts to be completed between (and including both end dates) Close (excluding Deposition of Nikolaus Baer to be taken November 7, 2008 Deposition of Nikolaus Baer Marvell Motion for Sanctions Opening brief filed Opposition brief filed no later than Reply brief filed no later than Hearing date Dispositive Motions Opening briefs filed no later than Opposition briefs filed no later than Reply briefs filed no later than Hearing no later than

October 17, 2008 October 27. 2008 November 1, 2008 November 1, 2008

November 7, 2008

October 31, 2008 November 14, 2008 November 21, 2008 December 5, 2008 November 28, 208 December 5, 2008 December 19, 2008 1/23/09

November 12, 2008 December 10, 2008 December 24, 2008 January 23, 2009, 9:30 am

DATED: November 14, 2008

SOMMERS & SCHWARTZ LLP

By__/s/ Andrew Schwartz______________ Andrew Schwartz Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant Intelligraphics, Inc.

-3-

1 2 DATED: November 14, 2008 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER RE: MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CS:\Intelligraphics\Marvell\Motions\Marvell motion for sanctions 10 31 08\Spero Stip Mot Sanctions.wpd

MAYER BROWN LLP

By ___/s/Michael A. Molano Michael A. Molano Attorneys for Defendant and CounterPlaintiff Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the filer hereby attests that the signatories' concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained:

UNIT ED

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

Dated: _11/___08 _________ __ 17/ __

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

___________________________________ HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO o r United StatesJoseph C. Spe Magistrate Judge Judge

R NIA

DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO

RT U O

NO

RT

H

-4-