Shop Ironworkers Local 790 Pension Trust et al v. Cofab Steel Corporation et al

Filing 122

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/27/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHOP IRONWORKERS LOCAL 790 PENSION TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COFAB STEEL CORP., et al., Defendants. / No. C 07-02500 JSW United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE This matter is set for a hearing on March 6, 2009 on the motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction filed by Arcmatic Welding Systems, Inc. and William Bong. The Court HEREBY ORDERS that opposition to the motion shall be filed by no later than February 10, 2009 and a reply brief shall be filed by no later than February 17, 2009. If the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument, it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this schedule, they may submit for the Court's consideration a stipulation and proposed order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested. The Court has received the parties' joint request to continue hearing dates. To the extent the parties seek to continue the motion to amend judgment which is currently scheduled to be /// /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 heard by Judge Zimmerman on February 18, 2009, the parties need to present such request directly to Judge Zimmerman. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 27, 2009 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?