Bibo et al v. Federal Express Inc.

Filing 119

STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing the hearing date on the Motion for Leave to Amend to 5/3/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/24/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W KERR ญญญญญ & ญญญญญ LLP MICHAEL VON LOEWENFELDT (178665) E-mail: mvl@kerrwagstaffe.com MICHAEL NG (237915) E-mail: mng@kerrwagstaffe.com JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY (173752) E-mail: corley@kerrwagstaffe.com KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP 100 Spear Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105ญ1528 Telephone: (415) 371-8500 Fax: (415) 371-0500 Daniel L. Feder (130867) E-mail: danfeder@pacbell.net LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL FEDER 807 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 391-9476 Fax: (415) 391-9432 Attorneys for PAUL BIBO, GEORGIA SHIELDS, ALEX GALVEZ, MARC GARVEY, BRYAN PETER, on behalf of all other similarly situated UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PAUL BIBO, an individual, GEORGIA SHIELDS, an individual, ALEX GALVEZ, an individual, MARC GARVEY, an individual, and BRYAN PETER, an individual, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-500, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. C 07-02505 TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AGSTAFFE Case No. C 07-02505 TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W KERR ญญญญญ & ญญญญญ LLP STIPULATION WHEREAS, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is currently scheduled for hearing on Monday April 19, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed upon a new hearing date of Monday, May 3, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, continuing the Motion to Amend Complaint currently set for April 19, 2010, would promote judicial efficiency and preserve the resources of both parties; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT the Motion to Amend Complaint currently scheduled for April 19, 2010 shall be continued to May 3, 2010. DATED: March 22, 2010 KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP By _____s/__________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY Attorneys for PAUL BIBO, GEORGIA SHIELDS, ALEX GALVEZ, MARC GARVEY, BRYAN PETER, on behalf of all other similarly situated DATED: March 22, 2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION By _____s/__________________________________ SANDRA C. ISOM Attorney for FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION ญ1ญ Case No. C 07-02505 TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AGSTAFFE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W KERR ญญญญญ & ญญญญญ LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the the Motion to Amend Complaint currently scheduled for April 19, 2010 shall be continued to May 3, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. 03/24/10 DATED: ______________ UNIT ED E TC _________________________________________ AT THELTONT HENDERSON, JUDGE E. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT S DISTRIC RT U O S ER N F D IS T IC T O R 1 Case No. C 07-02505 TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AGSTAFFE A C LI FO He elton E. udge Th J nderson R NIA NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W KERR ญญญญญ & ญญญญญ LLP I, Jacqueline Scott Corley, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Karl Olson, Counsel for Non-Party, has concurred in this filing. DATED: March 22, 2010 KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP By ________s/_______________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY 2 Case No. C 07-02505 TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AGSTAFFE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?