Bhatnagar v. Ingrassia et al

Filing 302

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 264 Motion for Sanctions and directing further submissions. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ABHINAV BHATNAGAR, Plaintiff, v. JASON INGRASSIA, et al., Defendants. / No. C 07-02669 CRB ORDER Defendants' motion for sanctions against plaintiff's counsel is DENIED for the reasons stated at oral argument on March 6, 2009. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions is also DENIED. Defendants shall submit to the Court a declaration with supporting documentation identifying the fees and costs defendants incurred in defense of plaintiff's claim that defendant Ingrassia made harassing telephone calls to plaintiff and his parents. Defendants shall meet and confer with plaintiff's counsel about their supplemental submission prior to filing the fee request with the Court. Plaintiff has filed an Objection to defendant Ingrassia's Bill of Costs. According to the Court's records, defendant Ingrassia has not filed a response. Defendant is directed to meet and confer with plaintiff concerning the objections to the Bill of Costs. If any issues remain unresolved after the meet and confer, defendant shall file with the Court a written response to the remaining objections. This response must be filed no later than the filing of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 defendant Ingrassia's supplemental submission regarding fees and costs incurred in defending the harassing telephone calls claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 6, 2009 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G:\CRBALL\2007\2669\order1fees.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?