Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.

Filing 14

Proposed Order re 13 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint by TD Ameritrade, Inc.. (Rubin, Lee) (Filed on 7/18/2007)

Download PDF
Elvey v. TD Ameritrade, Inc. Doc. 14 Case 3:07-cv-02852-MJJ Document 14 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP LEE H. RUBIN (SBN 141331) SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584) Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 lrubin@mayerbrownrowe.com sgupta@mayerbrownrowe.com Attorneys for Defendant TD Ameritrade, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MATTHEW ELVEY, an individual, and GADGETWIZ, INC., an Arizona corporation, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. TD AMERITRADE, INC., a New York corporation, and DOES 1 to 100, Defendants. Case No. C 07 2852 MJJ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING TD AMERITRADE'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Martin J. Jenkins Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 Time: 9:30 a.m. Loc: Courtroom 11, 19th Floor [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. C 07 2852 MJJ Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-02852-MJJ Document 14 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On Tuesday, August 28, 2007, Defendant TD Ameritrade's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint came on regularly for hearing. Having considered the Motion and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant's Motion is granted. The First Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs have 30 days to file an amended pleading. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ________________ ___, 2007 MARTIN J. JENKINS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO. C 07 2852 MJJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?