County of Santa Cruz et al v. Leavitt
Filing
102
ORDER GRANTING 101 Stipulation re CMC. Status Report due by 3/9/2012. Status Conference set for 3/16/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/5/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
Case3:07-cv-02888-JSW Document101
1
2
3
4
5
6
Filed12/02/11 Page1 of 4
Dario de Ghetaldi - Bar No. 126782
deg@coreylaw.com
Jerry E. Nastari - Bar No. 151756
jen@coreylaw.com
Amanda L. Riddle - Bar No. 215221
alr@coreylaw.com
COREY, LUZAICH, PLISKA, DE GHETALDI & NASTARI LLP
700 El Camino Real
P.O. Box 669
Millbrae, California 94030-0669
Telephone: (650) 871-5666
Facsimile: (650) 871-4144
7
8
Plaintiffs’ Co-Counsel
[Other Counsel on Signature Page]
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, COUNTY OF
SONOMA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
COUNTY OF MARIN, COUNTY OF SANTA
BARBARA, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, COUNTY OF MONTEREY,
THEODORE M. MAZER, M.D., WOLBERS
AND POREE MEDICAL CORPORATION,
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF )
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF )
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
Case No. 3:07-cv-02888-JSW
STIPULATION AND
SCHEDULING ORDER
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
Courtroom: 11
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER, Case No. 3:07-cv-02888-JSW
[PROPOSED]
Case3:07-cv-02888-JSW Document101
1
Filed12/02/11 Page2 of 4
STIPULATION
2
WHEREAS on September 23, 2011, Defendant, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the
3
United States Department of health and Human Services, through counsel, James D. Todd, Jr., and
4
Plaintiffs, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al., through counsel, Dario de Ghetaldi, entered into a
5
Stipulation and Scheduling Order, Dkt 95, requesting that the Court order the Case Management
6
Conference then set for September 30, 2011, and all associated filing deadlines be taken off calendar
7
while the parties pursued settlement discussions;
8
WHEREAS the Court, based upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing,
9
ordered that the Case Management Conference then scheduled for September 30, 2011, and all
10
associated filing deadlines be taken off calendar, and further ordered that the parties were to provide
11
the Court with a status report of their settlement discussions at a case management conference on
12
December 9, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., at which the Court ordered counsel for Defendant would be
13
permitted to appear by telephone;
14
15
WHEREAS on November 2, 2011, counsel for the parties met in Washington, D.C., and
engaged in direct settlement discussion of all issues raised in the First Amended Complaint;
16
WHEREAS on November 3, 2011, counsel, expert consultants, a representative of plaintiffs,
17
agency administrators, and agency staff met in Baltimore, Maryland, and engaged in all-day direct
18
settlement discussions of all issues raised in the First Amended Complaint;
19
WHEREAS since November 3, 2011, counsel for the parties have engaged in direct
20
settlement discussions and exchange of data and other information on at least a weekly basis; and
21
WHEREAS it is contemplated that in January, 2012, counsel, expert consultants and party
22
representatives will resume direct settlement discussions of all issues raised in the First Amended
23
Complaint.
24
THEREFORE, the parties hereby respectfully request by and through their counsel of record
25
that the Court order that the Case Management Conference scheduled for December 9, 2011, at 1:30
26
p.m., and all associated filing deadlines be taken off calendar while they continue to pursue
27
settlement discussions. The parties further respectfully request that the Court reschedule a case
28
management conference to take place, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16-10(a), with counsel for
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER, Case No. 3:07-cv-02888-JSW
Case3:07-cv-02888-JSW Document101
Filed12/02/11 Page3 of 4
1
Defendant to appear by telephone, for mid-March, 2012, at which time counsel will provide the
2
Court with a status report on the progress of settlement discussions.
3
Dated: December 2, 2011
4
5
6
7
8
9
/s/ Dario de Ghetaldi
Dario de Ghetaldi
COREY, LUZAICH, PLISKA,
DE GHETALDI & NASTARI LLP
700 El Camino Real
P.O. Box 669
Millbrae, California 94030-0669
(650) 871-5666
deg@coreylaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
/s/ James D. Todd, Jr.
Brian Kennedy
Acting Assistant Director
James D. Todd, Jr.
Senior Counsel
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
CIVIL DIVISION
FEDERAL PROGRAMS BRANCH
20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 514-3378
james.todd@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER, Case No. 3:07-cv-02888-JSW
Case3:07-cv-02888-JSW Document101
1
Filed12/02/11 Page4 of 4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that
3
the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint currently set for
4
December 9, 2011, and all associated filing deadlines be taken off calendar. It is further ordered that
5
March 16
the parties appear by telephone at a case management conference on ____________________, 2012,
6
1:30 p.m.
at _________, to provide the Court with a status report of their settlement discussions.
December 5, 2011
Dated:_______________________
7
8
_________________________________
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER, Case No. 3:07-cv-02888-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?