Fishbury, Limited et al v. Connetics Corporation et al

Filing 131

ORDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/8/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2008) Modified on 9/9/2008 (ts, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-02940-SI Document 130 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & W EST LLP SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB NO. 126930) DEAN S. KRISTY (CSB NO. 157646) CHRISTOPHER J. STESKAL (CSB NO. 212297) CATHERINE DUDEN KEVANE (CSB NO. 215501) EMILY ST. JOHN COHEN (CSB NO. 239674) CHRISTINE A. VOGELEI (CSB No. 239843) FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 smuck@fenwick.com dkrist y@fenwick.com csteskal@fenwick.co m ckevane@fenwick.com ecohen@fenwick.com cvogelei@fenwick.com Attorneys for Defendants Connetics Corp., John L. Higgins, Lincoln Krochmal, C. Gregory Vontz, and Thomas G. Wiggans UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A TTORNEYS AT L AW S AN F RANCISCO 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 Case No. C 07-02940 SI 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ANSWER CASE NO. C 07-02940 SI IN RE CONNETICS CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case 3:07-cv-02940-SI Document 130 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & W EST LLP A TTOR NEYS AT L AW S AN F RANCISCO This Stipulation is entered into by and among Teachers' Retirement System of Oklaho ma ("plaintiff") and defendants Connetics Corp., John L. Higgins, Lincoln Krochmal, C. Gregory Vontz, and Thomas G. Wiggans (collectively, "defendants"), through their respective attorneys of record. WHEREAS, on March 14, 2008, plaintiff filed its Second Amended Consolidated Complaint ("SAC"); WHEREAS, on May 2, 2008, defendants moved to dismiss the SAC; WHEREAS, on August 14, 2008, the Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part defendants' motions to dismiss and granting plaintiff until August 29, 2008 to amend its complaint; WHEREAS, plaintiff gave notice on August 29, 2008 that it would not amend the SAC and would proceed under the SAC; WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), defendants' deadline to answer the SAC is currently set for September 15, 2008; WHEREAS, given the length of the SAC and complexity of issues raised therein, the parties have agreed to extend defendants' time to answer the SAC; THERFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties as follows: Defendants' deadline to answer the SAC is extended until October 6, 2008. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ANSWER 2 CASE NO. C 07-02940 SI 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 3:07-cv-02940-SI Document 130 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & W EST LLP A TTOR NEYS AT L AW S AN F RANCISCO Dated: September 5, 2008 Respect fully submitted, /s/ CATHERINE KEVANE FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 941014 Tel: (415) 875- 2300 Fax: (415) 281-1350 Attorneys for Defendants Connetics Corp., John L. Higgins, Lincoln Krochmal, C. Gregory Vontz, and Thomas G. Wiggans Dated: September 5, 2008 /s/ MATTHEW P. SIBEN BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP 12481 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 Tel: (858) 793-0070 Fax: (858) 793-0323 Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Teachers' Retirement System of Oklaho ma and Lead Counsel to the Class 13 14 15 16 17 18 Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest 19 under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from 20 Matthew P. Siben. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ANSWER 3 CASE NO. C 07-02940 SI Case 3:07-cv-02940-SI Document 130 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & W EST LLP A TTOR NEYS AT L AW S AN F RANCISCO ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Wm. Alsup for DATED: THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ANSWER 4 CASE NO. C 07-02940 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?