Smith v. Perry
Filing
5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 7/2/07. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2007)
<![CDATA[
Smith v. Perry
Doc. 5
Case 3:07-cv-03045-WHA
Document 5
Filed 07/02/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RICK P. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. PERRY, A., et al., Defendants. / No. C 07-3045 WHA (PR) DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
This case was opened when an envelope was received from plaintiff, an inmate of the Contra Costa County Jail, containing three letters of complaint about events at the jail. In an effort to protect plaintiff's rights, they were treated as an attempt to open a new civil rights case. Because the letters were not accompanied by a filing fee or application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"), the clerk sent plaintiff a notice to that effect, along with an IFP form and a return envelope. Plaintiff has now filed the IFP application, which suggests he does indeed intend this to be a new case. The three letters with which plaintiff commenced this case do not amount to a proper complaint. Among other things, plaintiff does not say who he intends to be the defendants, nor what relief he wants. The letters, treated as a complaint, are therefore DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint on the court's form for prisoner Section 1983 actions. The amended complaint must be filed by a date thirty days from the date this order is entered or the case will be dismissed. It must be on the court's form, and plaintiff must write "First Amended
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:07-cv-03045-WHA
Document 5
Filed 07/02/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Complaint" and the case number of this case on the first page. The clerk shall send plaintiff the court's form packet for section 1983 cases. Because he has been granted leave to proceed IFP, plaintiff need not file the IFP application contained in the form packet.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 2 , 2007.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
G:\PRO-SE\WHA\CR.07\SMITH045.DWLTA
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
