Jenkins et al v. Mod.com

Filing 57

ORDER GRANTING 54 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Tucows, Inc. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on December 10, 2008. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-03112-JSW Document 54 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (Cal. Bar No. 226112) Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Cal. Bar No. 222187) Margarita Calpotura (Cal. Bar No. 244711) 150 Post Street, Suite 520 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 955-1155 Facsimile: (415) 955-1158 karl@kronenbergerlaw.com jeff@kronenbergerlaw.com margarita@kronenbergerlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs ANN JENKINS and ERNEST F. JENKINS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANN JENKINS, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. TUCOWS, INC., Defendant. Case No. C-07-03112 JSW NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C-07-03112 JSW NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 3:07-cv-03112-JSW Document 54 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs Ann Jenkins and Ernest F. Jenkins, Jr. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), by and through their designated counsel, and pursuant to Docket Entry 53, hereby dismiss with prejudice Tucows, Inc., as a defendant from the above-captioned action. DATED: December 9, 2008 KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP BY: /s/ Karl S. Kronenberger Karl S. Kronenberger Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ann Jenkins and Ernest F. Jenkins, Jr. IT IS SO ORDERED: DATED: December 10, 2008 BY: THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Case No. C-07-03112 JSW 1 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?