Rosenfeld v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Filing
146
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 145 Pursuant To Local Civil Rule 6-2 To Entry of Judgment and To Extend Time To Request Fees; and [Proposed] Order filed by United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012)
1
2
3
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
JOANN M. SWANSON (SBN 88143)
Chief, Civil Division
ILA DEISS (NYSBN 3052909)
Assistant United States Attorney
4
5
6
450 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone:
(415) 436-7124
Facsimile:
(415) 436-7169
Email:
ila.deiss@usdoj.gov
7
8
JAMES TIMBRELL
Certified Student Attorney
9
Attorneys for Defendants
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
SETH ROSENFELD,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, and UNITED STATES
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 07-3240 EMC
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO
LOCAL CIVIL RULE 6-2 TO ENTRY
OF JUDGMENT AND TO EXTEND
TIME TO REQUEST FEES; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2(a) and 7-12, the parties, through their undersigned
counsel, hereby stipulate that
1. WHEREAS on June 6, 2007, plaintiff Seth Rosenfeld brought this action against the
23
Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and the United States Department of Justice, seeking the
24
release of certain records under the FBI’s control through the Freedom of Information Act
25
(“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552;
26
27
28
2. WHEREAS on March 5, 2012, the Court rendered a decision on the parties’ final
motion for summary judgment and the FBI has complied with the Court’s order;
3. WHEREAS nothing is left in the dispute and the only remaining issue in the case is
Stipulation to Enter Judgment; Extension of Time
C 07-3240 EMC
1
plaintiff’s demand for attorney fees and costs under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E);
2
4. The parties hereby jointly request that the Court enter final Judgment in this matter
3
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(d) and allow the parties 60 days from the date of this Order for
4
plaintiff to serve defendants with a fee demand, for the parties to meet and confer about fees as
5
available under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E), and/or to file an appropriate motion with the Court, if
6
necessary.
7
5. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall constitute an admission by the FBI or the
8
United States Department of Justice that plaintiff is eligible for or entitled to an award of attorney
9
fees in this case.
10
11
12
6. This Stipulation and Order shall not constitute precedent in connection with a motion
for attorney fees in any other case.
7. This Stipulation and Order constitutes the entire agreement between plaintiff and
13
defendants.
14
Dated: March 20, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
15
16
18
/s/
ILA C. DEISS
Assistant United States Attorney
19
Attorneys for Defendants
17
20
21
Dated: March 20, 2012
__________/s/____________________
JAMES WHEATON
Attorney for Plaintiff
22
23
24
[PROPOSED] ORDER
25
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
1. This action IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with the exception of the plaintiff’s
27
demand for attorney fees as provided for under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E).
28
Stipulation to Enter Judgment; Extension of Time
C 07-3240 EMC
2
1
2. Judgment shall be entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a).
2
3. Plaintiff shall have 60 days from the date of this Order, in which to serve defendants
3
with a fee demand under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E), if any, meet and confer with defendants, and if
4
no agreement is met, to move the Court for appropriate relief.
5
RT
11
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
NO
10
J
ER
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Enter Judgment; Extension of Time
C 07-3240 EMC
3
A
H
12
R NIA
9
O
IT IS S
FO
8
___________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Court RED
ORDE Judge
LI
3/28/12
UNIT
ED
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
7
S
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?