Asis Internet Services v. Valueclick Inc.

Filing 10

STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order to Extend Defendant's Time to Respond To or Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Valueclick Inc.. (Smith, Michael) (Filed on 8/24/2007)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH Document 10 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP S. ASHLIE BERINGER (applying pro hac vice) 1801 California Street, Suite 4200 Denver, CO 80202-2642 Phone: (303) 298-5700 Fax: (303) 296-5310 aberinger@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP MICHAEL B. SMITH, SBN 235764 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Phone: (650) 849-5338 Fax: (650) 849-5038 msmith@gibsondunn.com Attorneys for Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. VALUECLICK, INC., dba VC E-COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC., also dba CONSUMERINCENTIVEZONE.COM, also dba PROMOTIONSGATEWAY.COM, also dba GENEROUSGENIE.COM, also dba REWARDSGATEWAY.COM, also dba CONSUMERPROMOTIONCENTER.COM, also dba REWARDAMAZON.COM, also dba GIVEAWAYCAFE.COM and DOES ONE through FIFTY, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. C 07-03261 (PJH) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WHEREAS, Plaintiff ASIS INTERNET SERVICES (the "Plaintiff") served the Complaint in this action on Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. (the "Defendant") on July 9, 2007; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 07-03261 (PJH) Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH Document 10 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP WHEREAS, Defendant originally was required to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by July 30, 2007; WHEREAS, the parties previously filed a stipulation and proposed order agreeing to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by thirty (30) days to August 29, 2007; WHEREAS, Magistrate Judge Chen granted the parties' stipulated request to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 29, 2007, by order dated August 2, 2007; WHEREAS Plaintiff has agreed to a brief additional extension of time of ten (10) days for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS Defendant does not intend to seek any further extensions of time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. shall have until September 10, 2007 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. DATED: August 23, 2007 SINGLETON LAW GROUP By: /s/ Jason K. Singleton Counsel for Plaintiff DATED: August 23, 2007 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: /s/ Michael B. Smith Counsel for Defendant 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 07-03261 (PJH) Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH Document 10 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.. Dated: __________________, 2007. United States District Judge 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 07-03261 (PJH)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?