Asis Internet Services v. Valueclick Inc.

Filing 14

Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH

Document 14

Filed 09/10/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP S. ASHLIE BERINGER (applying pro hac vice) 1801 California Street, Suite 4200 Denver, CO 80202-2642 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP MICHAEL B. SMITH, SBN 235764 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant VALUECLICK, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. VALUECLICK, INC., dba VC E-COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC., also dba CONSUMERINCENTIVEZONE.COM, also dba PROMOTIONSGATEWAY.COM, also dba GENEROUSGENIE.COM, also dba REWARDSGATEWAY.COM, also dba CONSUMERPROMOTIONCENTER.COM, also dba REWARDAMAZON.COM, also dba GIVEAWAYCAFE.COM and DOES ONE through FIFTY, inclusive, Defendants.

CASE NO. C 07-03261 (PJH) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

WHEREAS, Plaintiff ASIS INTERNET SERVICES (the "Plaintiff") served the Complaint in this action on Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. (the "Defendant") on July 9, 2007;

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 07-03261 (PJH)

Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH

Document 14

Filed 09/10/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

WHEREAS, Defendant originally was required to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by July 30, 2007; WHEREAS, the parties previously filed a stipulation and proposed order agreeing to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by thirty (30) days to August 29, 2007; WHEREAS, the Court granted the parties' stipulated request to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 29, 2007, by order dated August 2, 2007; WHEREAS, on August 24, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order to further extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by ten (10) days to September 10, 2007; WHEREAS, the Court granted the parties' stipulated request to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to September 10, 2007, by order dated August, 27, 2007; WHEREAS the parties have reached a settlement in principle, and desire to stipulate to an additional extension of time of eighteen (18) days to September 28, 2007 for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, to permit sufficient time for the parties to finalize their settlement agreement and file a stipulation of dismissal with the Court; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. shall have until September 28, 2007 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

DATED: September 10, 2007

SINGLETON LAW GROUP

By:

/s/

Jason K. Singleton

Counsel for Plaintiff

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 07-03261 (PJH)

Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH

Document 14

Filed 09/10/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

DATED: September 10, 2007

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

By:

/s/

Michael B. Smith

Counsel for Defendant

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND SO ORDERED..

Dated: __________________, 2007.

United States District Judge

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 07-03261 (PJH)