Asis Internet Services v. Valueclick Inc.
Filing
5
ORDER re
3 Stipulation filed by Valueclick Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/2/07. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2007)
Asis Internet Services v. Valueclick Inc.
Doc. 5
Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH
Document 5
Filed 08/02/2007
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP S. ASHLIE BERINGER (applying pro hac vice) 1801 California Street, Suite 4200 Denver, CO 80202-2642 Phone: (303) 298-5700 Fax: (303) 296-5310 aberinger@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP MICHAEL B. SMITH, SBN 235764 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Phone: (650) 849-5338 Fax: (650) 849-5038 msmith@gibsondunn.com Attorneys for Defendant VALUECLICK, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. VALUECLICK, INC., dba VC E-COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC., also dba CONSUMERINCENTIVEZONE.COM, also dba PROMOTIONSGATEWAY.COM, also dba GENEROUSGENIE.COM, also dba REWARDSGATEWAY.COM, also dba CONSUMERPROMOTIONCENTER.COM, also dba REWARDAMAZON.COM, also dba GIVEAWAYCAFE.COM and DOES ONE through FIFTY, inclusive, Defendants.
CASE NO. C 07-03261 (EMC) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, Plaintiff ASIS INTERNET SERVICES (the "Plaintiff") served the Complaint in this action on Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. (the "Defendant") on July 9, 2007;
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 07-03261 (EMC)
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH
Document 5
Filed 08/02/2007
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
WHEREAS, absent an extension of time, the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is July 30, 2007; WHEREAS, there have been no prior stipulations or requests for extension of time to respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant recently was retained to represent Defendant in this action, and Defendant requires additional time to prepare its response to the Complaint; and WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by thirty (30) days beyond the time limits specified in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. shall have until August 29, 2007 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
DATED: July 25, 2007
SINGLETON LAW GROUP
By:
/s/
Jason K. Singleton
Counsel for Plaintiff
DATED: July 25, 2007
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By:
/s/
Michael B. Smith
Counsel for Defendant
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 07-03261 (EMC)
Case 3:07-cv-03261-PJH
Document 5
Filed 08/02/2007
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND SO ORDERED..
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
UNIT ED
S
5
August 2 Dated: __________________, 2007.
S DISTRICT TE C TA
United States Magistrate Judge
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
FO
Judge Edward
M. Chen
R NIA
IT IS SO
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CASE NO. 07-03261 (EMC)
A
C
LI
FO
dwa Judge E
ORDERED
RT U O
rd M. C
hen
R NIA
I
ORD T IS SO
NO
ERED
RT U O
NO
RT
H
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?