McQuisten v. Lange

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 7, 2008. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2008)

Download PDF
McQuisten v. Lange Doc. 6 Case 3:07-cv-03392-MMC Document 6 Filed 02/07/2008 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States United States District Court District Court For the Northern r the Northern District of California Fo District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) MATTHEW LANGE, Facility ) Director, ) ) Respondent. ______________________________ ) JAMES McQUISTEN, No. C 07-3392 MMC (PR) ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AS MOOT Petitioner James McQuisten, a federal prisoner incarcerated at the Cornell Corrections Facility in Oakland, California, and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, challenging the validity of his confinement following the revocation parole. On January 7, 2008, the Court ordered respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted. On January 24, 2008, mail sent to petitioner by the Clerk of the Court was returned as undeliverable; on February 1, 2008, respondent filed a "Statement Noting Death of Petitioner." Attached to said statement is a certified copy of petitioner's death certificate, which certificate shows petitioner died on July 26, 2007. (See Statement Noting Death of Petitioner Ex. A.) The death of a habeas petitioner renders his petition moot and requires dismissal of the petition. See Garceau v. Woodford, 399 F.3d 1101, 1101 (9th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk shall close the file IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 7, 2008 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?