Wilson v. Compass Vision, Inc. et al

Filing 94

STIPULATION AND ORDER to continue the Telephonic Status Conference to 2/2/2009 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/25/08. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2008)

Download PDF
Eliot H. Lewis, Esquire Christian B. Green, Esquire POMERANTZ PERLBERGER & LEWIS LLP LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL G. GRADER 21 South 12th Street, 7th Floor 1860 Howe Avenue, Suite 350 Philadelphia, PA 19107 Sacramento, CA 92101-3554 (215) 569-8866 (916) 567- 6420 ehlewis@ppl-law.com Christian.Green@cna.com Attorney Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant National Medical Services, Inc Catherine A. Salah, Esquire GORDON & REES LLP 275 Batter Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 986-5900 csalah@gordonrees.com Attorney for Defendant Compass Vision, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBORAH WILSON, vs. COMPASS VISION, INC. and NATIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. D/B/A NMS LABS JOANNE ELIZABETH CLEVELAND, CYNTHIA DANIELS, LAURA FUJISAWA, CAROLINE HOWE and TRACEY MOORE : : : : : : : : CASE NO. C07-3431 BZ : : : : : : vs. : : : COMPASS VISION, INC. and : NATIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. : d/b/a NMS LABS : : : : __________________________________________: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE NO. CV 07 5642 BZ JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: December 1, 2008 3:00 p.m. G Hon. Bernard Zimmerman Cases No. 07 CV 5642 BZ and 07 CV 3431 BZ JOINT STIPULATION It is herein requested by all counsel that the telephonic status conference for the above captioned cases be continued until Monday, February 2, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. The stated reason for the status conference was to determine a test case for trial. Although all parties have been diligent in attempting to complete discovery, the depositions of the plaintiffs have not been taken. The parties do not want to unduly take up Your Honor's time, as until the depositions of the plaintiffs have been taken, there can be no meaningful discussion on which plaintiff's case should be the test case for trial. Dated: November 25, 2008 For Plaintiffs BY: /s/ Eliot H. Lewis Eliot H. Lewis, Esquire For Defendant Compass Vision, Inc. BY: /s/ Catherine Salah Catherine Salah, Esquire T For Defendant National Medical Services, Inc. BY: /s/ Christian Green Christian Green, Esquire PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED The trial and pretrial dates remain as scheduled. Dated: 11/25/08 UNIT ED Hon. Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge S S DISTRICT TE C ________________________________ TA Jud JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE Cases No. 07 CV E R BZ and 07 CV 3431 BZ 5642 C N F D IS T IC T O R 2 A LI FO ard Zim ge Bern merman R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?