Ambat et al v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 344


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MERCY AMBAT, et al. 9 Plaintiffs, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 No. C 07-03622 SI ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant. / 13 14 Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to submit by 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 1, 2011 a 15 sworn declaration, accompanied by contemporaneous time records, as to the attorney and paralegal 16 time spent performing tasks that related solely to the retaliation claims of plaintiffs Janssen, Spires- 17 Morgan, and Versher. The declaration and records should reflect how much time was spent, when, by 18 whom and doing what, and should be limited to work related only to the Janssen, Spires-Morgan, and 19 Versher retaliation claims. (Doc. 272). 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 30, 2011 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?