Ambat et al v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 351


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MERCY AMBAT, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 No. C 07-03622 SI ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant. / 13 14 On September 2, 2011, following a hearing, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s 15 fees in the amount of $8,925. On September 7, 2011, the Court received a letter from plaintiffs seeking 16 clarification of the Court’s reasoning behind the amount. While not explicitly styled as a motion for 17 reconsideration, that is essentially what it is. In its September 2nd order, the Court adequately explained 18 its reasoning behind the fees granted. To the extent plaintiffs are moving for reconsideration, their 19 request is DENIED. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 19, 2011 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?