Ambat et al v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 412

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/21/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
ELIZABETH S. SALVESON, State Bar #83788
Chief Labor Attorney
JONATHAN ROLNICK, State Bar #151814
RAFAL OFIERSKI, State Bar #194798
Deputy City Attorneys
1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Daniel H. Bromberg (SBN 242659)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff JON GRAY
Lawrence D. Murray (SBN 77536)
MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
1781 Union Street
San Francisco, CA 94123
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS (Except Jon Gray)

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

MARCY AMBAT, et al.,

20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-3622 SI

Case No. C 07-3622 SI
STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FRCP 41 AND ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CMC DATE:
Time:
Judge:
Place:

January 22, 2016
3:00 p.m.
Hon. Susan Illston
Courtroom #10
19th Floor

1
2

I.

STATUS OF CASE AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
The parties have agreed to settle this matter. The Settlement Agreement has been fully

3

executed by all plaintiffs that remain in this action and by the Sheriff of San Francisco. The

4

settlement has been approved by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and the Mayor of San

5
6

Francisco, and the payments called for by the Settlement Agreement have been made.
Paragraph 9 of the Settlement Agreement states that within three (3) court days after both
receiving a fully executed copy of the agreement and being notified that the agreement has been

7

approved by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, plaintiffs will dismiss this action in its entirety

8

and with prejudice by filing a “Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice” pursuant to FRCP 41.

9
10

Therefore, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement of the parties, the parties file this stipulated
dismissal with prejudice and request that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice.

11

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
ELIZABETH SALVESON
Chief Labor Attorney
JONATHAN ROLNICK
Deputy City Attorney
RAFAL OFIERSKI
Deputy City Attorney

12
13
14
15
16

January 20, 2016

17
18
19

By: /s/ Jonathan Rolnick
JONATHAN ROLNICK
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN

20
21

January 20, 2016

22
23

MURRAY & ASSOCIATES

24
25

By: /s/ Daniel Bromberg
DANIEL BROMBERG
Attorneys for Plaintiff JON GRAY

January 20, 2016

26

By: /s/Lawrence D. Murray
LAWRENCE MURRAY
Attorney for PLAINTIFFS (Except Jon Gray)

27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-3622 SI

1

1

ORDER ON REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

2

The Court having considered the parties’ stipulated Request for Dismissal with Prejudice,

3

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING:

4

This matter is ordered dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing its own fees and costs

5

as agreed by the parties.

6
7
8
9

21
January ___, 2016

10

By:

_
United States District Court Judge
District Court of Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-3622 SI

2

1
Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1

2
3
4
5
6

I, Jordan R. Jaffe, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to are used to
make this filing, attest that in accordance with Civil Local Rule 5.1, concurrence in the filing of the
document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
Date: January 20, 2016

7

/s/ Jordan R. Jaffe
Jordan R. Jaffe

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-3622 SI

3