Ambat et al v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 417

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 415 Stipulation to Retain Jurisdiction over Distribution of Settlement Funds (with Judicial signature). (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
ELIZABETH S. SALVESON, State Bar #83788
Chief Labor Attorney
JONATHAN ROLNICK, State Bar #151814
RAFAL OFIERSKI, State Bar #194798
Deputy City Attorneys
1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Daniel H. Bromberg (SBN 242659)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff JON GRAY
Lawrence D. Murray (SBN 77536)
MURRAY & ASSOCIATES
1781 Union Street
San Francisco, CA 94123
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS (Except Jon Gray)

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

MARCY AMBAT, et al.,

20
21
22
23

Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.

24
25
26

Case No. C 07-3622 SI
AMENDED STIPULATED DISMISSAL
OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FRCP 41 AND ORDER
FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
WITH RETENTION OF
JURISDICTION TO DISTRIBUTE
SETLLEMENT AMONGST
PLAINTIFFS
CMC DATE:
January 22, 2016
Time:
3:00 p.m.
Judge:
Hon. Susan Illston
Place:
Courtroom #10
19th Floor

27
28
AMENDED STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-3622 SI
04957-18586/7602423.1

1
2

I.

STATUS OF CASE AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
The parties have agreed to settle this matter. The Settlement Agreement has been fully

3

executed by all plaintiffs that remain in this action and by the Sheriff of San Francisco. The

4

settlement has been approved by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and the Mayor of San

5

Francisco, and the payments called for by the Settlement Agreement have been made.
Paragraph 9 of the Settlement Agreement states that within three (3) court days after both

6

receiving a fully executed copy of the agreement and being notified that the agreement has been

7

approved by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, plaintiffs will dismiss this action in its entirety

8

and with prejudice by filing a “Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice” pursuant to FRCP 41.

9
10
11

Therefore, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement of the parties, the parties file this stipulated
dismissal with prejudice and request that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice.
The parties also stipulate that this court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of
supervising, if needed, enforcement the provisions of the Settlement Agreement regarding

12

distribution of the settlement award among the individual plaintiffs.

13

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
ELIZABETH SALVESON
Chief Labor Attorney
JONATHAN ROLNICK
Deputy City Attorney
RAFAL OFIERSKI
Deputy City Attorney

14
15
16
17
18

January 26, 2016

19
20

By: /s/ Jonathan Rolnick
JONATHAN ROLNICK
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

21
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN

22
23

January 26, 2016

24
25

By: /s/ Daniel Bromberg
DANIEL BROMBERG
Attorneys for Plaintiff JON GRAY
MURRAY & ASSOCIATES

26
27

January 26, 2016

28

By: /s/Lawrence D. Murray
LAWRENCE MURRAY
Attorney for PLAINTIFFS (Except Jon Gray)

AMENDED STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-3622 SI
1
04957-18586/7602423.1

1

ORDER ON REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

2

The Court having considered the parties’ stipulated Request for Dismissal with Prejudice,

3

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING:

4

This matter is ordered dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing its own fees and costs

5

as agreed by the parties.

Additionally, this court will retain jurisdiction to supervise and if needed

enforce the provisions of the Settlement Agreement for distribution of the settlement award to the
6

individual plaintiffs.

7
8
9
10
11

26
January ___, 2016

12

By:

_
United States District Court Judge
District Court of Northern District of California

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AMENDED STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-3622 SI
2
04957-18586/7602423.1