McHugh v. Hillerich & Bradsby Company

Filing 86

ORDER GRANTING 85 Stipulation TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITATION FOR PLAINTIFF MARK L. MCHUGHS OPPOSITION TO H&BS CROSS-MOTION OF NONINFRINGEMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF LACHES AND WILFULNESS AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INF RINGEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/14/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:07-cv-03677-JSW Document85-1 Filed09/11/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 v. MARK L. MCHUGH, an individual, Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MCHUGH'S LEAVE TO FILE AN EXTENDED BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO H&B'S CROSS-MOTION OF NONINFRINGEMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF LACHES AND WILFULNESS AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT CASE NO. C07-03677 JSW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO., 15 a private company, 16 17 18 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00400786v1} Defendants. -1Order Extending Page Limitation (Case No. C07-03677 JSW) Case3:07-cv-03677-JSW Document85-1 Filed09/11/09 Page2 of 2 1 Having read the parties' stipulation to extend the Court's page limitation for plaintiff Mark 2 L. McHugh's second brief on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, and good cause 3 appearing, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Mark L. McHugh may file a 35-page brief in 5 opposition to defendant's Hillerich & Brasby Co.'s cross-motion for summary judgment or, in the 6 alternative, summary adjudication and in reply in support of plaintiff Mark L. McHugh's motion for 7 summary judgment. 8 9 10 11 Dated: September 14 , 2009 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00400786v1} IT IS SO ORDERED. HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge -2Order Extending Page Limitation (Case No. C07-03677 JSW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?