Veterans for Common Sense et al v. Nicholson et al
*** FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE REFER TO DOCUMENT 158 . ***
Veterans for Common Sense et al v. Nicholson et al
Doc. 156 Att. 2
AFFIDAVIT OF PROCESS SERVER
United States District Court
Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans United for Truth, Inc. PIaintiff vs. James B. Peake, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et a1 Defendant Case Number: C-07-3758 SC
District Of Columbia
Attorney: Morrison & Faerster LLP Alexandria Amezcua 425 Market St. San Francisco, CA. 94105
Court / Appearance Date: 63-03-2008 Court The: 09:30 m
Legal documents received by Same Day Process Service on February 27th,2008 at 3:95 PM to be served upon Antonette M. Zeiss, W., Chief Consultant, Mental Health Services, Dept. of Veterans Affairs at 810 Deputy Vermont Ave., NW,WasMngton, DC. 20420
I, B. Tony Snesko, swear and affirm that on February 27th, 2008 at 4:OJ PM, Idid the following:
Individually Sewed Joy Muhammad, General Counsel's Offiee the person authorized to accept on behalf of Antonette M. Zeiss, M.D.of the legal document with this Subpoena in a Civil Case at the above address. Dcscription of Person Accepting Service: Sex: Female Age: 45 Height: 5'5 Weight: 145 Skin Color: Black Hair Color: Black Glasses: N Supplemental Data Appropriate to this Service: Paid $40.00 in witness fees.
I declare under penalty af perjury under the laws of the that the foregoing information contained in this affidavit is true and correct and that I am a professional process server over the age of 18 and have no interest in the above legal ma!ter.
District of Columbia: SS Subscribed and Sworn to before me,
Same Day Process Service 1322 Maryland Ave., NE Washington, DC 20002
Michael Wash, Notary Public, D.C. MY commission expires J U I ~ I
Internal Job ID: 000000780I
Copyright Q 2005-2007 Process Server Central, LLC.A11 rights resewed.
Same Day Process Service
1322 Maryland Ave., NE Washington, DC 20002 Phone 202.398.4200 Fax 202.398.1862 FElN 14-1937022
DATE: FEBRUARY 27,2008
CASE INFORMATION: C-07-3758 SC
Alexandria Amezcua Morrison & Foerstsr LLP 425 Market St. San Francisco, CA 94105
Plaintit Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans United for Truth, Inc. Defendant: James 6. Peake, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al Received: 02-27-2008 Completed: 02-27-2008
To be served on: Antonette M. Zeiss, M.D., Deputy Chief Consultant, Mental Health Services, Dept. of Veterans Affairs
CLIENT REFERENCE NUMBER
TERMS Due on 03-13-2008
UNIT PRICE $37.50 $40.00 $0.00 TOTAL $37.50 $40.00 $0.00
QUANTITY 1. O O 1. O O 1.OO PAYMENTS
DESCRIPTION 2nd Doc. Service ISame Location Advanced Witness Fee Rush Service Fee
ICHECK NO. 1 AMOUNT
SUBTOTAL SALES TAX RETAINER PAID TOTAL DUE
$77.50 $0.00 $0.00 $77.50
COMMENTS OR SPEClAL INSTRUCTIONS:
Make all chedts payable to Same Day Process Service. Please enclose a copy of this invoice with your payment. Payment of this invoice is not contingent on reimbursement from your client. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, contact: Tony Snesko, 202-398-4200, firstname.lastname@example.org
Thank you for your budnernf
Copyright Q 2005-2007 P m $ Senrer Central. LLC. Alf rights reserved.
0 A 0 88 (Rcv. 12/06) Subpoena in a Civil Case
Issued by the
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE and VETERANS UNITED FOR TRUTH, INC.
JAMES B. PEAKE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al.
SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE
CaseNumber: District of California
' Case pending in USDC Northern
TO: Antonettc M. Zeiss, M.D.,
Deputy Chief Consultant, Mental Health Services,
Dept, of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW,Washington DC, 20420;
YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States District court. at the place, date, and time specified below to testify in the above case.
PI-ACT:' TESTIMONY OF
U. S. District Court, Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94 102
Courtroom I , 17" floor
DATE AND TlME
3/3/08; 9:30 am
YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the place, date, and time specified below to testify at the taking of a deposition in the above case.
PLACE OF DEPOSITION
YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents or objects at the place, date, and time specified below (list documents or objects):
DATE AND TIME
YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit inspection of the foIlowing premises at the date and time specified below.
DATE AND TlME
Any organization not a party to this suit that is subpoenaed for the taking of a deposition shall designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or other persons who consent to testify on its behalf, and may set forth, for each person designated, the matters on which the person will testify. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 30fb)(6).
ISSUiNG OPFICl:R'S SIUNA'I'URI-:AND'FIT1.E (INDICATE IF A71'ORNBY FOR PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT)
Attorney for Plaintiffs
ISSUING OI2FICER1S NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER
Alexandria A. Amezcua (SEN 247507) Morrison & ~o&ster LLP 425 Market Street, San Francisco CA 94105-2482 415.268.7000
(See Rule 45. Federal Rules of Civil Rocedure, Subdivisions (c), (d). and (e). on next page)
If action is pending in district other than district of issuance, slate district under case number.
A 0 88 (Rcv 12/06) Subpoena b a Civil Case
PROOF OF SERVICE
SERVED ON (PRINT NAME) M A N m R OF SERVICE
SBRVialioll~na fi)mor forms in Mieh the person ordinvity maintains it or in a form or tbms that arc rcnsonably
(C) A pwscn respanding to a si~bpoona nced not produa: the same elcc~ronietllIy stored infiation more t b one form. @) A person responding to a subpoena need not provide dismvc~y elcclrpn~cally or Homd lnfonnation from fiat ~e lxrson identifies as not reasonably amsible heEause , burden or cost, on of d to compel discovery or to quash, tlie person fiurn wlio111 disoowry is sought must show lhat the infnmation sol~ghr not reasonably access~blc is hcausc of undue burden or wst. If that showing is made. the coilrt m y nonothel~ss order discovery from such sortrces if the requesting pmy shows good cause. consrdenny the limitations ol.Rule 26(b)[ZHC). Tl~e cwn may spcc~fy cortdrtions Tor the d~scovcry. (2) (A) When infomtatlon subjec? to a subpoena is w~lhhcld a clam that it is pnvilcped on or subject to protechon as mal-prepanllon malcrids. Ihe claim shall be made expressly and e ar shalt be supported by a description o f ~ h nature of the documents, conrmun~cations, things n d p r o d 1 4 that is sufficient to enable t k demanding p to contest ~ h clntrn. w c (8)If rnformat~ona produced in responsc to a subpoena that tr mb~ectlo a claim or s privilege or of prdbaion a b5al-preparation malerial, tlw person making tlrc clarm may nolify any party Cat received the ~nformatton the claim and tho basis for it. Aftcr being notified. of a party must promplly return. seq11estc.r.or destroy the spccitied infon~lation any mp~cs and i! has and may not we or disclose the ~niwr~lstion the claim is rosolvcd A receiving puny unl~l may pmmptly presenl the information to the corm undcr seal for a dctenninat~on orthe claim. If Lr w i v i n g party disclosed the information heforr being notifi~d.it mnst lakc reawnnblc steps to &eve it. The person who produced the ~nformatiori must prcservc the ~nlimnation ~mtil claim is remtved. the d (~)CONT~MPT. Frnlure of any person without adequate excuse io obey a sabpwna ~ r v upon subpwna ~ssuud.AII that person may be deemed a contempt or tlic coud 60m which tl~e adequate c a w for Failure to obey oxis6 when a .cuhpx.na puqons to requilr a nonparty to attend o pmduce at a place not withi the I~mits r pmvidcd by clause (11)of si~bpmgmph
NOTICE by Veterans United for Truth, Inc, Veterans for Common Sense Notice of Proofs of Service of Subpoenas in a Civil Case
(Attachments: # 1
Exhibit A (Guagliardo), # 2
Exhibit B (Zeiss), # 3
Exhibit C (Cross), # 4
Exhibit D (Katz), # 5
Exhibit E (Kearns))(Erspamer, Gordon) (Filed on 2/29/2008) Modified on 3/3/2008 (feriab, COURT STAFF).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?