Obiajulu v. San Mateo County Probation Department

Filing 52

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/14/2008. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 MICHAEL P. MURPHY, COUNTY COUNSEL (SBN 83887) BY: V. RAYMOND SWOPE III, DEPUTY (SBN 135909) BY: CLAIRE A. CUNNINGHAM, DEPUTY (SBN 226941) HALL OF JUSTICE AND RECORDS 400 COUNTY CENTER, 6TH FLOOR REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 TELEPHONE: (650) 363-4759 FACSIMILE: (650) 363-4034 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LAWRENCE J. KING (CSB #120805) 6 "C" STREET PETALUMA, CA 94952 PHONE: (707) 769-9791 FAX: (707) 769-9253 ATTO RNEY FOR PLAINTIFF VINCENT OBIAJULU THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VINCENT OBIAJULU, Plaintiff, v. SAN MATEO COUNTY, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 \\ \\ \\ \\ Defendant. S CASE NO. C 07-3870 JCS S S S T I P U L A T ED R E Q U E S T S DISMISSAL S S S S S S S S FO R The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request that this 1 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 case be dismissed pursuant to the settlement reached between the parties. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. Dated: November 10, 2008 MICHAEL P. MURPHY, COUNTY COUNSEL By: V. Raymond Swope III ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Dated: November 10, 2008 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 14 , 2008 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE J. KING By: /s/ Lawrence J. King ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF VINCENT OBIAJULU [PROPOSED] ORDER Having reviewed the parties stipulation and finding good cause therefor, the parties request is hereby GRANTED and this case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties settlement. IT IS SO ORDER. The Honorable Joseph Spero Unit ed States Magistrate Judge 2 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?