Jonathan Browning, Inc. -v- Venetian Casino Resort, LLC

Filing 261

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 260 Motion to Continue (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009)

Download PDF
1 Ray L. Wong (SBN 84193) DUANE MORRIS LLP 2 One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94105-1104 3 Telephone: 415.957.3000 Facsimile: 415.957-3001 4 E-Mail: rlwong@duanemorris.com 5 Michelle Hon (SBN 234492) Courtney L. Bunt (SBN 234410) 6 DUANE MORRIS LLP 101 West Broadway, Suite 900 7 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619.744.2200 8 Facsimile: 619.744.2201 E-Mail: mhon@duanemorris.com 9 Attorneys for Defendants VENETIAN CASINO 10 RESORT, LLC; LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC, and LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. 11 12 13 14 15 JONATHAN BROWNING, INC., 16 17 v. STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF REVISED REPLY BRIEF FILING DATE AND HEARING DATE Plaintiff, CASE NO.: C 07-3983 JSW (BZ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC, LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC, LAS VEGAS SANDS 19 CORP., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC, LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC, LAS VEGAS SANDS 22 CORP., 23 24 v. Third-Party Plaintiffs, 25 KIRK NIX ASSOCIATES INC. D/B/A KNA INTERIOR DESIGNS, a California 26 corporation, 27 28 STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF REVISED HEARING DATE Third-Party Defendant. C 07-3983 JSW(BZ) 1 DM1\1971683.1 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), defendants VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC, LAS 2 VEGAS SANDS, LLC, and LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. (collectively "Defendants") and plaintiff 3 JONATHAN BROWNING, INC. ("Plaintiff"), hereby stipulate to and request the Court enter the 4 proposed Revised Reply Brief Filing Date and Hearing Date, as set forth herein. 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that 6 both Defendants and Plaintiff agree to a short extension of time for Defendants' to file their Reply 7 Brief in Support of their Motion for Attorneys' Fees ("Reply Brief") and the hearing date on 8 Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees currently scheduled in the above-captioned matter. 9 Defendants' Reply Brief is currently scheduled to be filed on November 18, 2009. The 10 hearing on Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees is currently scheduled to be heard before Judge 11 Zimmerman on December 2, 2009. These dates have not previously been extended. 12 Good cause to extend these dates can be found on the grounds that Defendants' counsel, 13 Michelle A. Hon, who is the attorney specifically in charge of preparing the Reply Brief has been, 14 and is, seriously ill and unable to prepare the Reply Brief for filing on November 18, 2009 due to her 15 illness. (See, Declaration of Michelle A. Hon in Support of Stipulation for Entry of Revised Reply 16 Brief Filing Date and Hearing Date, filed concurrently herewith.) 17 Thus, the parties hereby stipulate to and request that the Court approve the stipulation and 18 reschedule the filing date of Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of their Motion for Attorneys' Fees 19 to December 2, 2009 and the hearing date on Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees to December 20 16, 2009. 21 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF REVISED HEARING DATE C 07-3983 JSW(BZ) SO STIPULATED. 2 DM1\1971683.1 1 Dated: November 17, 2009 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 17, 2009 By: DUANE MORRIS LLP s/ Courtney L. Bunt Ray L. Wong Michelle Hon Courtney L. Bunt Attorneys for Defendants VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC, LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC, and LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. McNamer and Company By: __s/Anthony McNamer______________________ Anthony McNamer Attorneys for Plaintiff JONATHAN BROWNING INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 18 Dated: November __, 2009 By: __ _______________________ Hon. Bernard Zimmerman UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF REVISED HEARING DATE C 07-3983 JSW(BZ) 3 DM1\1971683.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?