Galindo et al v. Financo Financial Inc et al

Filing 103

ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 31, 2008. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California ROSA GALINDO and MARIA GALINDO Plaintiffs, v. FINANCO FINANCIAL, INC., PATRICK PATCHIN, AHMED YAMA ASEFI, AAROON SADAT and NAZIA NAWABZADA, COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A., COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP., HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL NETWORK, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE COMPANY, JOSEPH ESQUIVEL, PAMELA SPIKES, and DOES 1100, Defendants. / ORDER RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING No. C 07-03991 WHA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the reasons stated at the evidentiary hearing, depositions for Rosa and Maria Galindo will occur by the schedule stated. For Maria Galindo's new deposition, each side will have two hours and an interpreter must be present. Plaintiffs will pay for three-fourths of the cost for the interpreter and court reporter. Defendant Financo will pay the remaining one-fourth of the cost. Plaintiffs' counsel will make no objections or instructions, other than for privilege, at the depositions. All objections, other than for privilege however, will be preserved. The deposition should be videotaped. For Rosa Galindo's deposition, each side will have one hour and costs will be divided in their normal way. An interpreter and videotape must be present. Plaintiffs will have the opportunity to depose the defense individual called out at the evidentiary 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 hearing under the same no-objecting rules above except that costs will be divided in their normal way and no interpreter need be present. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 31, 2008. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?