Chattler -v- United States of America
ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION. Counsel for defendants is ordered to respond to plaintiff's administrative motion on or before Wednesday, May 20, 2009 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 19, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiff's Administrative Motion to Continue Hearing Date on Motions for Summary Judgment, filed May 18, 2009, by which plaintiff seeks to continue the May 22, 2009 hearing on the parties' respective motions for summary judgment. Pursuant to the Civil Local Rules of this District, defendants' response thereto is not due until Thursday, May 21, 2009, and may be electronically filed as late as 11:59 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time on that date. See Civil L.R. 7-11(b). Defendants' counsel of record is located in Washington, D.C. Under such circumstances, in order to arrive in timely fashion for the hearing as presently scheduled, it is likely such counsel will be required to depart Washington, D.C. prior to the Court's ruling on the instant administrative motion. // United States District Court JULIE CHATTLER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants / No. C-07-4040 MMC ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Accordingly, to avoid an unnecessary appearance should the Court ultimately determine to continue the hearing date, counsel for defendants is hereby ORDERED to respond to plaintiff's administrative motion on or before Wednesday, May 20, 2009 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 19, 2009
MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?