Yates v. Union Square et al

Filing 93

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMOVE Confidential Item from Docket. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/7/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH, Esq. (SBN 148213) tim@thimeschlaw.com THIMESCH LAW OFFICES 158 Hilltop Crescent Walnut Creek, CA 94597-3452 Telephone: (925) 588-0401 Facsimile: (888) 210-8868 LAW OFFICES OF GENE A. FARBER GENE A. FARBER, ESQ. (SBN 44215) genefarber@gmail.com 4258 Twenty Sixth Street San Francisco, CA 94131 Telephone: (415) 956-1800 Facsimile: (415 ) 282-4228 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD SKAFF JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP MARTIN H. ORLICK, ESQ. (Bar No. 083908), MOrlick@jmbm.com MATTHEW S. KENEFICK, ESQ. (Bar No. 227298), MKenefick@jmbm.com Two Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3824 Telephone: (415) 398-8080 Facsimile: (415) 398-5584 Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO UPTOWN PARKING CORPORATION, a Non-Profit Public Benefit Corporation PATRICK M. RYAN, ESQ. (CA Bar No. 203215) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3900 San Francisco, CA 94111-5894 Telephone: 415-591-1000 Facsimile: 415-591-1400 pryan@winston.com DENNIS J. HERRERA, ESQ., (SBN 139669) DANNY CHOU, ESQ. (SBN 180240) danny.chou@sfgov.org JAMES M. EMERY, ESQ. (SBN 153630) jim.emery@sfgov.org ELAINE M. O'NEIL, ESQ. (SBN 142234) elaine.o'neil@sfgov.org Fox Plaza, 1390 Market St., Sixth Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 554-4261 Facsimile: (415) 554-3985 Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MICHAEL BETTINGER, ESQ. RACHEL R. DAVIDSON, ESQ. K&L GATES LLP 55 Second Street, Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA 94105-3493 Tel: (415) 882-8200 Fax: (415) 882-8220 rachel.davidson@klgates.com mike.bettinger@klgates.com Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant SAN FRANCISCO PARKING, INC. d/b/a CITY PARK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRAIG YATES, Plaintiff, vs. UNION SQUARE, et al. Defendants. AND RELATED THIRD PARTY ACTION. / Case No. C07-04087-JSW (EDL) For Submission to: Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO REMOVE CONFIDENTIAL ITEM FROM DOCKET TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH LAPORTE: To avoid potential breach of the rules regarding the confidentiality of settlement Stipulation and Order to Remove Confidential Item from Docket: Case No. C07-4087-JSW 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 proceedings, the parties request removal from the docket of Item Number 91, which is a copy of plaintiff counsel's letter to Her Honor of April 1, 2009. SO STIPULATED. DATED: April 7, 2009 THIMESCH LAW OFFICES TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH GENE A. FARBER By: /s/ Signature Authorized Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD SKAFF DATED: April 7, 2009 JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP MARTIN H. ORLICK MATTHEW S. KENEFICK By: /s/ Signature Authorized Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO UPTOWN PARKING CORPORATION DATED: April 7, 2009 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ELAINE O'NEIL JOANNE HOEPER JAMES MOXON EMERY By: /s/ Signature Authorized Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DATED: April 7, 2009 PATRICK M. RYAN, ESQ. WINSTON & STRAWN LLP MICHAEL BETTINGER, ESQ. RACHEL R. DAVIDSON, ESQ. K&L GATES LLP By: /s/ Signature Authorized Attorneys for Defendant CITY PARK ORDER UNIT ED . Dated: April 7, 2009 S SO ORDERED. ISTRIC ES D TC AT T C R Case No. C07-4087-JSW Stipulation and Order to Remove Confidential Item from Docket: N F D IS T IC T O R E A LI FO HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE aporte MAG. JUDGEliOF tU.S.LDISTRICT COURT e h D. e E zab NO Judg R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D RT U O RT H 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?