Lyman et al v. Asbestos Defendants (B*P) et al

Filing 139

ORDER ADDRESSING MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES. In light of the 138 Notice, the hearing set for June 9, 2014, and the trial set for June 16, 2014, are VACATED. The associated motions ( 117 , 120 , 121 , and 122 ) are DEEMED MOOT. The action for the cr oss-claim remains pending, and I will hold the case management conference currently set for August 5, 2014. Montello shall file its amended answer with its cross-claim for indemnity within three days of this Order. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/06/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBERT F. LYMAN, et al., Case No. 07-cv-04240-WHO Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER ADDRESSING MISCELLANEOUS ISSUES 9 10 UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On June 6, 2014, the plaintiffs informed me that they have resolved their claims against 14 defendants Union Carbide Corporation and Montello, Inc. Dkt. No. 138. Accordingly, the 15 hearing currently set for June 9, 2014, and the trial set for June 16, 2014, are VACATED. The 16 associated motions (Dkt. Nos. 117, 120, 121, 122) are DEEMED MOOT. 17 On June 2, 2014, I allowed Montello leave to assert a cross-claim against Union Carbide 18 for indemnity and ordered that trial on the cross-claim be severed from the original action. Dkt. 19 No. 134. The action for the cross-claim remains pending and I will hold the case management 20 conference currently set for August 5, 2014. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Montello shall file its amended answer with its cross-claim for indemnity within three days of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2014 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?