Brown-Booker et al v. Apple Inc. et al

Filing 31

ORDER continuing cmc to 2/2/09 @ 4 p.m.. Signed by Judge Illston on 1/21/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-04397-SI Document 30 Filed 01/19/2009 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID M. WALSH (SB# 120761) (davidwalsh@paulhast ings.co m) PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street Twent y-Fift h Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228 Telephone: (213) 683-6000 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 Attorneys for Defendants APPLE INC. and DEKA IMMOBILIEN INVESTMENT PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053) CELIA McGUINNESS (SBN # 159420) LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 200 Lakeside Dr., Suite A Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 832-5001 JULIE OSTIL, Esq. (SBN 215202) LAW OFFICE OF JULIE A. OSTIL 1989 Santa Rita Rd., #A-405 Pleasanton, CA 94566 (925) 265-8257 Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICOLE BROWN-BOOKER and JANA OVERBO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NICOLE BROWN-BOOKER, and JANA OVERBO, Plaint iffs, vs. APPLE INC.; DEKA IMMOBILIEN INVESTMENT GMBH; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants. Case No: 3:07-cv-04397-SI JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: Time: Ctrm: January 20, 2009 4:00 p.m. 10, 19th Floor Case No. 3:07-CV-04397-SI JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case 3:07-cv-04397-SI Document 30 Filed 01/19/2009 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiffs Nico le Brown-Booker and Jana Overbo ("Plaint iffs") and Defendants Apple Inc. and Deka Immobilien Investment GMBH ("Defendants") (collect ively, the "Parties") through their respective counsel of record: WHEREAS, a Further Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for January 20, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. before this Court; WHEREAS, the Parties recently agreed upon the settlement of this matter, subject to documentation and the Court's approval; WHEREAS, the Parties are presently finalizing the Settlement Agreement and proposed Consent Decree; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the January 20, 2009 Further Case Management Conference be continued to February 2, 2009 so that the Parties can submit the Settlement Agreement and proposed Consent Decree for the Court's approval. - 2Case No. 3:07-CV-04397-EMC JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case 3:07-cv-04397-SI Document 30 Filed 01/19/2009 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED: Respect fully submitted, Dated: January 19, 2009 PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP By: /s/ David M. Walsh 6 7 8 9 10 11 By: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 3Case No. 3:07-CV-04397-EMC Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. Dated: January 19, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN LAW OFFICES OF JULIE A. OSTIL /s/ (on consent) Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICOLE BROWN-BOOKER, and JANA OVERBO JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case 3:07-cv-04397-SI Document 30 Filed 01/19/2009 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER On the stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Further Case Management Conference set for Tuesday, January 20, 2009, at 4:00 p.m. in this action is vacated. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties shall appear on Monday, February 2, at 4:00 p.m. for a Further Case Management Conference in this action, with the Parties' Joint Case Management Conference Statement due seven days prior. Dated: January _____, 2009 Susan Illston United States District Court Judge LEGAL_US_E # 82408937.1 - 4Case No. 3:07-CV-04397-EMC JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?