Recht v. Warren Productions

Filing 4

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James DISMISSING CASE, denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2007)

Recht v. Warren Productions

Doc. 4

Case 3:07-cv-04410-MEJ

Document 4

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed on August 27, 2007. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), where a plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court must dismiss the complaint if it determines that the complaint is frivolous or malicious, or that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I), (ii). Here, Plaintiff's complaint falls directly within the category of pleadings identified in § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I) and (ii). Plaintiff alleges that "NATO Leaders need to remove the Pope and the Priest and they have to Exicute the CIA/FBI Agents and Doctors that are molesting animals and children and holding hostages the Governments refused to let the civilians and animals have protection of an alien out break of possion of rosemarries babies and will not protect the children and the animals and the wemen and men from molesters and criminals and canables." [sic]. The vs. WARREN PRODUCTIONS, Defendant(s). / LOUIS T. RECHT, Plaintiff(s), IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 07-4410 MEJ ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-04410-MEJ

Document 4

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

complaint continues in a similar manner for multiple pages without setting forth a viable claim against Defendant Warren Productions, and there is no indication Plaintiff can cure the deficiencies in her complaint. The Court also notes that this is the ninth case filed by Plaintiff within the last year. These cases show a flagrant abuse of the court system by someone who has filed floridly delusional complaints.1 Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED and her application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 29, 2007

MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

C-06-4919 MMC, Recht v. U.S., was filed on August 15, 2006 and dismissed on August 17. C-06-4980 CRB, Recht v. Heartland Financial, was filed on August 17, 2006 and dismissed November 29, 2006. C-06-4981 MEJ, Recht v. VISA, was filed on August 17, 2006. C-07-2668 SBA, Recht v. Risk Management, was filed May 21, 2007 and dismissed on June 11, 2007. C-07-2670 JL, Recht v. U.S. Army, was filed on May 21, 2007 and dismissed on May 24, 2007. C-07-2671 MMC, Recht v. Homeland Security, was filed May 21, 2007 and dismissed on July 9, 2007. C-07-2673 MMC, Recht v. Navy, was filed on May 21, 2007 and dismissed on July 9, 2007. C-07-2674 SI, Recht, et al. v. Hansen, was filed on May 21, 2007.
1

2

Case 3:07-cv-04410-MEJ

Document 4

Filed 08/29/2007

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Louis T. Recht General Delivery Seattle WA 98107 Louis T. Recht 725 6th Ave #2 San Francisco CA 94201 Louis T. Recht PO Box 424217 San Francisco CA 94118 Dated: August 29, 2007 v. LOUIS T. RECHT, Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case Number: CV07-04410 MEJ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

WARREN PRODUCTIONS, Defendant. /

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on August 29, 2007, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk

3