Ortega v. Giamalvo

Filing 105

ORDER re 104 Stipulation filed by Michael Giamalvo. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on December 20, 2011. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011)

Case3:07-cv-04436-EDL Document104

1
2
3
4
5

Filed12/19/11 Page1 of 2

J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000)
[e-mail]
LYNNE G. STOCKER (SBN 130333)
[e-mail]
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225
Oakland, California 94612
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant
DEPUTY MICHAEL GIAMMALVO

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES

11
12

LAZARUS A. ORTEGA,

Case No.: 3:07-cv-04436-EDL

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

DEPUTY MICHAEL GIAMALVO, et al.

16

[Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte]

Defendants.

17
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated

19

counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

20

Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that each party shall bear his own costs.

21

Dated: 25 October 2011

ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES

22

/s/ Lynne G. Stocker
By:

23

Lynne G. Stocker
Attorneys for Defendant
DEPUTY MICHAEL GIAMMALVO

24
25

SNR DENTON US LLP

26
/s/ Bonnie Lau
27

Dated: Oct. 25, 2011

By:
Bonnie Lau
Attorneys for Plaintiff, LAZARUS ORTEGA

28
1
{00076732.DOC/}AIMS 0713

[STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Ortega v. Giamalvo, et al.

3:07-cv-04436-EDL

Case3:07-cv-04436-EDL Document104

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

Filed12/19/11 Page2 of 2

The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

December 20, 2011
Dated: __________________
THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge

6
7
8
9
10

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
{00076732.DOC/}AIMS 0713

[STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Ortega v. Giamalvo, et al.

3:07-cv-04436-EDL