Alemozaffar v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 72

ORDER GRANTING 66 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages re Reply to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment . Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/11/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2009) Modified on 2/11/2009 (jjo, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy SCOTT D. WIENER, State Bar #189266 DANIEL A. ZAHEER, State Bar #237118 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-4283 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MEHRDAD ALEMOZAFFAR, Plaintiff, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; JESSE SERNA, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; GARY MORIYAMA, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; J MCGRATH, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; J. REYMUNDO, individually and in his official capacity as a deputy sheriff officer for the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; G. COVIELLO, , individually and in his official capacity as a deputy sheriff officer for the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Defendants. Case No. C07-4494 JSW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR ORDER ALLOWING DEFENDANTS TO EXCEED 15 PAGE LIMIT IN THEIR REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [CIVIL L.R. 7-11] [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RELIEF FR PG LIMIT Alemozaffar v. CCSF, et al. ­ USDC No. C07-4494 JSW n:\lit\li2007\080046\00537025.doc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11(a), Defendants' submitted a Request For Order Allowing Defendants To Exceed Page Limit In Defendants' Reply to Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Having considered Defendants' submissions, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' motion and allows Defendants to file a reply brief up to 18 pages, exclusive of tables, declarations and exhibits. February 11, 2009 Dated: _________________ _____________________________________ HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: RELIEF FR PG LIMIT Alemozaffar v. CCSF, et al. ­ USDC No. C07-4494 JSW n:\lit\li2007\080046\00537025.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?