Rohnert Park Citizens to Enforce CEQA v. California Department of Transportation et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER to continue briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/14/08. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) United States Attorney JOANN SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division CHARLES M. O'CONNOR (CSBN 56320) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor P.O. Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102 415-436-7180 Attorneys for the Defendants THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ROHNERT PARK CITIZENS TO ENFORCE CEQA, and DOES 1 through 5, inclusive ) Civil No. 07-04607 TEH ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE v. ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) ORDER TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ) (Proposed) ADMINISTRATION, and DOES 6 through 10, ) inclusive, ) )Hearing Date: December 8, 2008 Defendants. )Time: 10:00 a.m. __________________________________________) The parties' cross motions for summary judgment ("MSJ") are scheduled for hearing on December 8, 2008, and the remaining briefing schedule is currently set as follows: - Defendant's brief in support of MSJ and opposition to Plaintiff's MSJ is due October 14, 2008 - Plaintiff's brief in opposition to Defendant's MSJ and reply is due October 27, 2008 - Defendant's reply brief is due November 3, 2007. The parties hereby request that the briefing schedule be extended six days for Defendants brief in support of MSJ and one week for the other briefs, so that the revised briefing schedule would be as follows: - Defendant's brief in support of MSJ and opposition to Plaintiff's MSJ is due October 20, 2008 - Plaintiff's brief in opposition to Defendant's MSJ and reply is due November 3, 2008 - Defendant's reply brief is due November 10, 2007. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 The parties do not request a change in the hearing date for the motions, and if the revised briefing schedule is approved by the Court, the hearing date will not be affected and will remain as set for December 8, 2008. Therefore, the parties' request to extend the briefing schedule will not delay the ultimate resolution of this matter. No prior extensions of the briefing schedule were requested or granted in this matter. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that the current briefing schedule may be amended, as follows: - Defendant's brief in support of MSJ and opposition to Plaintiff's MSJ is due October 20, 2008 - Plaintiff's brief in opposition to Defendant's MSJ and reply is due November 3, 2008 - Defendant's reply brief is due November 10, 2007. Dated: October 14, 2008 Respectfully submitted, Law Office of Rose M. Zoia /s/ ROSE M. ZOIA Attorney for Plaintiff 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14 Dated: October___, 2008 IT IS SO ORDERED, Dated: October 14, 2008 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ CHARLES M. O'CONNOR Assistant United States Attorney _______ Attorneys for the United States UNIT ED S ORDER S DISTRICT TE C TA F STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE NORDER -D IS T RIC T O Civil No. 07-04607 TEH ER A C LI Page -2- FO THELTON E. HENDERSON enderson .H United States District Thelton E Judge Judge R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?