Rojas v. Loza et al

Filing 52

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY TO COMPLAINT. Defendants are directed to file, no later than ten court days from the date of the filing of this order, a reply to the complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 18, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2010)

Download PDF
Rojas v. Loza et al Doc. 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 18, 2010 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge Before the Court is defendants' "Wavier of Reply and Demand for Jury Trial," filed November 17, 2010. In light of the Court's March 8, 2010 order denying defendants' motion for summary judgment, the Court finds plaintiff has a "reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits." See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2). Accordingly, defendants are hereby DIRECTED to file, no later than ten court days from the date of the filing of this order, a "reply to the complaint." See id. IT IS SO ORDERED. v. R. LOZA, et al., Defendants. / JAHIR ALBERTO ROJAS, Plaintiff, No. C-07-4662 MMC ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY TO COMPLAINT United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?