Edwards et al v. Reynolds et al
ORDER AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES; VACATING MAY 15, 2009 HEARING. No later than May 29, 2009, plaintiffs shall file and serve on counsel for defendants any su pplemental opposition to defendants' motion for an award of fees. No later than June 12, 2009, defendants shall file any supplemental reply. As of June 12, 2009, the Court will take the matter under submission, unless the parties are otherwise advised. The hearing scheduled for May 15, 2009 is vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 8, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is defendants Michael J. Reynolds, Betsy Strauss, and the City of Santa Rosa's "Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees," filed March 30, 2009. Plaintiffs Randall Edwards and Betty Sue Edwards have jointly filed two opposition briefs, one on March 31, 2009, and the other on April 3, 2009, to which defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court, for the reasons set forth below, finds it appropriate to vacate the hearing scheduled for May 15, 2009 and to afford plaintiffs leave to file supplemental opposition to address evidence offered for the first time by defendants with their reply. A party seeking an award of attorney fees "has the burden of producing satisfactory evidence, in addition to the affidavits of its counsel, that the requested rates are in line with those prevailing in the community for similar services of lawyers of reasonably comparable skill and reputation." See Southerland v. International Longshoremen's and v. MICHAEL J. REYNOLDS, et al., Defendants / RANDALL L. EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-07-4710 MMC ORDER AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES; VACATING MAY 15, 2009 HEARING United States District Court IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Warehousemen's Union, 845 F.2d 796, 801 (9th Cir. 1988) (emphasis in original) (internal quotation and citation omitted). Here, in support of their moving papers, the only evidence offered by defendants is a declaration submitted by their counsel, specifically, counsel's statement that his time is "billed at $325 an hour." (See Casey Decl. ¶ 3.) Consequently, defendants' moving papers are insufficient to support an award of fees. See id. In support of their reply, however, defendants offer a declaration submitted by Iris Yang ("Yang"), an attorney who does not represent defendants. In her declaration, Yang offers the opinion that the $325 rate sought is "a reasonable market rate for representing [defendants herein]." (See Yang Decl. ¶ 3.) Plaintiffs have not had the opportunity to respond to Yang's declaration. Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the following supplemental briefing schedule: 1. No later than May 29, 2009, plaintiffs shall file and serve on counsel for defendants any supplemental opposition to defendants' motion for an award of fees. 2. No later than June 12, 2009, defendants shall file any supplemental reply. 3. As of June 12, 2009, the Court will take the matter under submission, unless the parties are otherwise advised. The hearing scheduled for May 15, 2009 is hereby VACATED, and no party shall appear on said date. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 8, 2009
MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?