Ali v. City of Hayward et al

Filing 103

ORDER re (102 in 3:07-cv-04718-CRB) Stipulation filed by Maria Joya, Set/Reset Deadlines as to (102 in 3:07-cv-04718-CRB) Stipulation, (60 in 3:07-cv-04718-CRB) MOTION for Summary Judgment <(43 in 3:07-cv-04739-CRB) MOTION for Summary Judgment Responses due by 3/12/2010. Replies due by 3/19/2010.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/10/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar #69888 BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar #222173 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 Email: john.burris@johnburrislaw.com bnisenbaum@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SALEH ALI, individually and as the administrator of the estate of NASER ALI SOLIS Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF HAYWARD; LLOYD LOWE, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF HAYWARD; JASON CORSOLINI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the CITY OF HAYWARD; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. MARIA JOYA, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of NASIR SOLIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF HAYWARD, a municipal corporation; LLOYD LOWE, in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF HAYWARD; JASON CORSOLINI, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the CITY OF HAYWARD; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, Defendants. / 1 Case No. C 07 04718 CRB and related Case Case No. C 07 04739 CRB STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER EXTENDING DATES TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER EXTENDING DATES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE COURT AND PARTIES in the above-entitled action: On Wednesday, February 17, 2010, the parties mediated both of the above-noted related actions, resulting in a proposed settlement subject to approval by the City Council of Defendant CITY OF HAYWARD. On February 19, 2010, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment to be heard on March 26, 2010. The proposed settlement was rejected by the Hayward City Council at its closed session meeting on March 2, 2010. The parties agreed to extend Plaintiffs' date to file oppositions to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by one week in the event the City Council rejected the proposed settlement. Currently, Plaintiffs' Opposition is due to be filed on March 5, 2010. The parties stipulate that Plaintiffs Opposition shall be filed on March 12, 2010, with Defendants' Reply Brief due on March 19, 2010. No other dates shall be affected by this stipulation. Dated: March 5, 2010 The Law Offices of John L. Burris _/s/_Benjamin Nisenbaum ______________ Benjamin Nisenbaum Attorney for Plaintiff MARIA JOYA Dated: March 5, 2010 Kletter Law Firm _/s/__Cary Kletter___________________ Cary Kletter Attorney for Plaintiff SALEH ALI Dated: March 5, 2010 MICHAEL S. LAWSON, City Attorney By: _____/s/_______________________ RANDOLPH S. HOM, Assistant City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER EXTENDING DATES 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (PROPOSED) ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Opposition) by March 12, 2010. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading by March 19, 2010. No other dates shall be affected by this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:________________ March 10, 2010 S DISTRICT TE C TA ____________________________________ RT U O UNIT ED HONORABLE CHARLES S. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICTD DERE JUDGE er S ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO harles Judge C R. Brey R NIA O IT IS S OR NO RT STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER EXTENDING DATES H 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?