Wistron Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
Filing
252
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 251 Pursuant to Stipulation, It is Ordered that the hearing date in this matter set for 12/18/2008 is moved to 1/22/2009 at 2:30 PM. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 12/15/2008. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008) .
Case 3:07-cv-04748-VRW
Document 251
Filed 12/11/2008
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (STATE BAR NO. 122196) michael.bettinger@klgates.com TIMOTHY P. WALKER, PHD (STATE BAR NO. 105001) timothy.walker@klgates.com HAROLD H. DAVIS, JR. (STATE BAR NO. 235552) harold.davis@klgates.com K&L GATES Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.882.8200 Facsimile: 415.882.8220 Attorneys for Plaintiff WISTRON CORPORATION, WISTRON INFOCOMM (TEXAS) CORPORATION, WISTRON LLC, WISTRON INFOCOMM (AMERICA) CORPORATION
MARK D. FOWLER, Bar No. 124235 mark.fowler@dlapiper.com ELIZABETH DAY, Bar No. 177125 elizabeth.day@dlapiper.com TIMOTHY LOHSE, Bar No. 177230 timothy.lohse@dlapiper.com SAL LIM, Bar No. 211836 sal.lim@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER US LLP 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 Tel: 650.833.2000 Fax: 650.833.2001 Attorneys for Defendant and CounterPlaintiff SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION WISTRON CORPORATION, a Taiwan corporation, Plaintiff and CounterDefendant, vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Republic of Korea corporation, . Defendant and CounterPlaintiff Case No. C 07-04748 VRW JOINT STIPULATION TO MOVE DECEMBER 18, 2008 HEARING TO JANUARY 22, 2009
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Counterclaim-Plaintiff vs. WISTRON CORPORATION et al Counterclaim-Defendants
C 07-4748 VRW
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOVING DECEMBER 18, 2008 HEARING DATE
Case 3:07-cv-04748-VRW
Document 251
Filed 12/11/2008
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WHEREAS: 1. 2. The parties are currently negotiating a settlement agreement, There is a hearing on the parties' motions for summary judgment currently scheduled
for December 18, 2008, 3. The parties agree that moving the current hearing date from December 18, 2008 to
January 22, 2009 will provide the parties with additional time to reach a possible settlement agreement, and 4. The parties wish to memorialize their agreement in writing by this Stipulation, and
hereby file such Stipulation in accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-1(b). NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the hearing on the parties' motions for summary judgment be moved from December 18, 2008 to January 22, 2009. Dated: December 11, 2008 DLA PIPER US LLP
By: _______/s/ Sal Lim /s/________________ MARK FOWLER M. ELIZABETH DAY TIMOTHY LOHSE SAL LIM NICKOLAS BOHL ERIK FUEHRER Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Dated: December 11, 2008 K&L GATES
By: ________/s/ Harold H. Davis /s/_________ MICHAEL J. BETTINGER TIMOTHY P. WALKER, PHD HAROLD H. DAVIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Claim Defendants WISTRON CORPORATION, WISTRON INFOCOMM (TEXAS) CORPORATION, WISTRON INFOCOMM TECHNOLOGY (AMERICA) CORP., and WISTRON LLC
C 07-4748 VRW
1 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOVING DECEMBER 18, 2008 HEARING DATE
Case 3:07-cv-04748-VRW
Document 251
Filed 12/11/2008
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING MOVING DECEMBER 18, 2008 HEARING DATE
C 07-4748 VRW
[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT THE HEARING DATE IN THIS MATTER SET FOR DECEMBER 18, 2008 IS MOVED TO JANUARY 22, 2009.
UNIT ED
6
12/15/2008 Dated:_____________
________________________________ Hon. Vaughn R. Walker Chief Judge, RDERED District Court United States
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
RT U O
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
aughn R Judge V
FO
Walker
R NIA
IT IS S
OO
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?