Gidding et al v. Anderson et al

Filing 130

ORDER GRANTING #129 Stipulation Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on October 6, 2008. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-04755-JSW Document 129 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MATTHEW F. QUINT, ESQ. California Bar No. 54369 WILSON & QUINT LLP 250 Montgomery Street, 11th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.288.6700 Facsimile: 415.398.1608 Email: mfquint@aol.com Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JOHN GIDDING, PIVOTAL INC. Plaintiffs, vs. DEREK ANDERSON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C-07-4755 JSW PLAINTIFFS' AND PLANTAGENET DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLANTAGENET DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING NOW COME Plaintiffs JOHN GIDDING and PIVOTAL, INC. (Plaintiffs) and the PLANTAGENET DEFENDANTS (Defendants) and hereby stipulate to extend the Plantagenet Defendants' time in which to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint. This stipulation is entered into with reference to the following facts: This Court's Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (doc. 115) states that, "Should Plaintiffs elect to file a third amended complaint, they shall do so by no later than September 29, 2008 and any response from defendants shall be filed no later than twenty days thereafter." Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on September 29, 2008. On that same date, Defendants' counsel, Matthew F. Quint, underwent prostate surgery at John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek. Mr. Quint is still recuperating from that surgery. 1 PLAINTIFFS' AND PLANTAGENET DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR PLANTAGENET DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING Case 3:07-cv-04755-JSW Document 129 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 2 of 2 October 6, 2008

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?